The issue with Time and Evolution

Discussion about scientific issues as they relate to God and Christianity including archaeology, origins of life, the universe, intelligent design, evolution, etc.
Post Reply
PaulSacramento
Board Moderator
Posts: 9224
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ontario, Canada

The issue with Time and Evolution

Post by PaulSacramento »

http://www.nature.com/news/dna-mutation ... et-1.17079

Part of the article:
In the past six years, more-direct measurements using ‘next-generation’ DNA sequencing have come up with quite different estimates. A number of studies have compared entire genomes of parents and their children — and calculated a mutation rate that consistently comes to about half that of the last-common-ancestor method.

A slower molecular clock worked well to harmonize genetic and archaeological estimates for dates of key events in human evolution, such as migrations out of Africa and around the rest of the world1. But calculations using the slow clock gave nonsensical results when extended further back in time — positing, for example, that the most recent common ancestor of apes and monkeys could have encountered dinosaurs. Reluctant to abandon the older numbers completely, many researchers have started hedging their bets in papers, presenting multiple dates for evolutionary events depending on whether mutation is assumed to be fast, slow or somewhere in between.

Last year, population geneticist David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, and his colleagues compared the genome of a 45,000-year-old human from Siberia with genomes of modern humans and came up with the lower mutation rate2. Yet just before the Leipzig meeting, which Reich co-organized with Kay Prüfer of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, his team published a preprint article3 that calculated an intermediate mutation rate by looking at differences between paired stretches of chromosomes in modern individuals (which, like two separate individuals’ DNA, must ultimately trace back to a common ancestor). Reich is at a loss to explain the discrepancy. “The fact that the clock is so uncertain is very problematic for us,” he says. “It means that the dates we get out of genetics are really quite embarrassingly bad and uncertain.”
SoCalExile
Valued Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:20 pm
Christian: Yes

Re: The issue with Time and Evolution

Post by SoCalExile »

The fact that they are essentially making up numbers to fit their assumptions is an embarrassment to the idea of science.
God's grace is not cheap; it's free.
bippy123
Prestigious Senior Member
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:56 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age

Re: The issue with Time and Evolution

Post by bippy123 »

SoCalExile wrote:The fact that they are essentially making up numbers to fit their assumptions is an embarrassment to the idea of science.
Yes , but like I said many times before many of the young atheists and naturalists on this forum and other forums don't think that these scientists will ever stoop so low as to bring their worldview into their interpretations of the data and as this link shows they do that on a regular basis .

Just look at neuroscientist who still believe that there is no reason to believe that Nde's aren't caused by the brain. This isn't real science
stefano2015
Newbie Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:00 am
Christian: No
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided

Re: The issue with Time and Evolution

Post by stefano2015 »

Genetics, like every other science, is relative. And there are many theories on human origin. I think we have to wait to get right answers.
crochet1949
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1467
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:04 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Female
Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist

Re: The issue with Time and Evolution

Post by crochet1949 »

There's been an on-going debate Genesis creation vs. evolutionary thought for years and will probably continue -- scientists who will do most Anything to maintain their professional standing -- regarding how man got here / how long he's been here. Genetics is a fascinating subject. And when evidence begins to lean in a direction they don't like -- it's the 'we need more time to study and there will always be areas we don't have answers for' When in reality we Do have God's Word With the answers -- 'we' simply don't like to accept that. It's usually too 'something' to be taken too literally or too 'whatever'.

I'm no scholar -- just someone who's done a lot of researching on my own. Adding my two cents worth. :esmile:
Post Reply