Evidence for God from Science

Proinsias wrote:Drop me a pm if you're in the area, would be nice to see you for a beer.


But will Vicky and Nathaniel have meet for coffee first?

cslewislover wrote:

Proinsias wrote:Drop me a pm if you're in the area, would be nice to see you for a beer.


But will Vicky and Nathaniel have meet for coffee first?

+ Well Vicki what do you say?

My spelling mistake has now been quoted twice.

Please stop, talk about it over coffee if you must

Gabrielman wrote:

cslewislover wrote:

Proinsias wrote:Drop me a pm if you're in the area, would be nice to see you for a beer.


But will Vicky and Nathaniel have met for coffee first?

+ Well Vicki what do you say?

Soon and very soon . . . +

(I was wondering why he assumed we hadn't met for coffee yet?)

Only an ass........assumes

Proinsias wrote:Only an ***........assumes

So either you're an ***, or you had some insider info, or . . . Hmmm. I suppose the way you wrote it could be somewhat ambiguous.

Don't feel bad Proinsias I didn't realize your spelling mistake until you said there was one!

cslewislover wrote: Soon and very soon . . . +

(I was wondering why he assumed we hadn't met for coffee yet?)

+ I can't wait!

cslewislover wrote:

Proinsias wrote:Only an ***........assumes

So either you're an ***, or you had some insider info, or . . . Hmmm. I suppose the way you wrote it could be somewhat ambiguous.

To clear up the ambiguity, I'm an ass.

Gabrielman wrote: Don't feel bad Proinsias I didn't realize your spelling mistake until you said there was one!

cslewislover wrote: Soon and very soon . . . +

(I was wondering why he assumed we hadn't met for coffee yet?)

+ I can't wait!

Proinsias wrote:

cslewislover wrote:

Proinsias wrote:Only an ***........assumes

So either you're an ***, or you had some insider info, or . . . Hmmm. I suppose the way you wrote it could be somewhat ambiguous.

To clear up the ambiguity, I'm an ***.

I was referring to your original statement, but if you insist.

Here's one but I do not have the cartoon that goes with it as it was in an old Philosophy book, so you'll have to visualize it…

Picture One:

A Nerdy Geeky Philosophy Professor leaving the Philosophy Building with Philosophy Department sign shown in background

Caption:

...Professor Hietzlman…






Picture Two

Shows Nerdy Geeky Philosophy Professor Hietzlman walking / smashing into a tree

Caption two:

He was a real Kantian square!
-
-
-

hmm....that required too much prior knowledge for me!!!

zoegirl wrote:hmm....that required too much prior knowledge for me!!!

At least he got to know the tree in and of itself!
-
-
-

B. W. wrote:

zoegirl wrote:hmm....that required too much prior knowledge for me!!!

At least he got to know the tree in and of itself!
-
-
-

But did his pain really exist?

Why did the turkey cross the road?











To prove he wasn't chicken.