Let's try...Audie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:36 pmI asked if disproving ToE is easy to do...where is the Nobel.RickD wrote: ↑Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:52 amAudie,
I don't get it. When you were here before, you complained about trying to have a rational discussion about evolution. Now that DBowling wants to have a discussion about specific things regarding evolution, you just attack Behe and Meyer, without actually responding to the points that DBowling brought up.
Here's your chance to have a discussion with someone who is actually knowledgeable about something you are interested in discussing.
DB said, "I dont have to..Behe and Meyers have already
done the heavy lifting."
Then it was over and over that Behe has shown some
aspect of 19th centuty was wrong.
If there was sense or point in to any of response, I still
dont get it.
How about a yes or no question...
Do you believe that the following statement is factually accurate or inaccurate?
Behe and Meyer have demonstrated that the Darwinian processes of Random Mutation and Natural Selection alone are incapable of explaining what we see in the fossil record (especially the Cambrian Explosion), and they also cannot explain the structure, complexity, and diversity of information that we see in the DNA of life today.