![Image](http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/content/ktrk/images/cms/989374_630x354.jpg)
And THIS time, the snake did not deceive!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
HappyFlappyEnabler wrote:Click bait
I dont get it!?HappyFlappyEnabler wrote:Click bait
Click bait is when someone puts a purposely misleading title, that's much more interesting than the actual story, just to get you to click on the link.Storyteller wrote:I dont get it!?HappyFlappyEnabler wrote:Click bait
The link is interesting.Storyteller wrote:Really? Well I never!
There's a name for everything![]()
So not worth reading the link then?
So it was!RickD wrote:The link is interesting.Storyteller wrote:Really? Well I never!
There's a name for everything![]()
So not worth reading the link then?
So,PaulSacramento wrote:Nature finds a way.
That aside, what I like to point out to some skeptics that have issues with the virgin birth is that, as of right now and for some time, Science has enabled a virgin to become pregnant.
Of course it was a miracle.RickD wrote:So,PaulSacramento wrote:Nature finds a way.
That aside, what I like to point out to some skeptics that have issues with the virgin birth is that, as of right now and for some time, Science has enabled a virgin to become pregnant.
You're saying that the virgin birth of Christ isn't a miracle? It seems to me, that if science can show how something can happen, then by definition, it's not a miracle, right?
You're not saying that conception by the HS is backed by science?
True.Paul: Of course it was a miracle. Just because science can reproduce an event using a different method, doesn't mean that the event done the original way is not a miracle.