Sno,
I, as much as anyone, am for looking into things. You are a mocker. This forum is for people who are genuinely sincere. You've made it clear that you are not. You are an elephant hurler. You present tired arguments, and before you even consider an answer you have moved on to the next objection. If you think adhering to fallacious reasoning is "looking into everything" then so be it. You are letting others tell you what to believe, because you are simply regurgitating arguments.
Here is one from the other thread.
If you don't believe in me you're going to hell, you better believe in me or else. What kind of God works that way given what we know about the Universe today?
These type of obejections have been asked and answered thousands of times. It is a consequential objection. "I don't like it, therefore it's not true."
What about the Roman Catholic Pope condemning condoms? How many people have died and are still dying from AIDS or other STDS because of his public statement? That is negligent manslaughter, a small time cult leader would have put on trial.
This is also church related, the scandals of the raping of young boys and covering it up?
Here is another. What does this have to do with whether the Christian God is real or not? Nothing. Zero. Zilch. The claims of the Bible? Nothing.
If not why? If you had grown up as a Greek, you would be worshipping the God's they believed in.
You've already been shown that this is fallacious reasoning. One of many rhetorical fallacies you commit often. If you don't have enough sense to look into logic and reasoning and stop letting fallacy dictate your "looking into things" then you haven't got sense enough to come in out of the rain.
Lets, see, should we start with inquisitions, witch hunts and the crusades?
How do these confirm or dispute the claims of the Bible? oh wait, they don't. They are just an emotional objection. You have to smuggle in the Christian God to impune these atrocities, and you aren't even clever enough to understand what you are doing.
You are a troll plain and simple, and I'm surprised you haven't been told to leave. Your quote here from the DCM thread is all the evidence needed.
There isn't decent evidence for any God buddy.
If there is a God there is no reason to think he is the god depicted by the Christian religion.
There is plenty of evidence. And plenty of evidence to expose your fallacious reasoning.
-“The Bible treated allegorically becomes putty in the hands of the exegete.” John Walvoord
"I'm not saying scientists don't overstate their results. They do. And it's understandable, too...If you spend years working toward a certain goal and make no progress, of course you are going to spin your results in a positive light." Ivellious