First off,don't be so sensitive as we only know you based on what you post and you are anti-flood whenever it comes up,which does show a bias.
So lets see, the honest
thing for you to do, is to make up some outlandish lies about me and then say the fault is entirely with me, because I am sensitive.
You are pro-flood, does that show a bias?
If I consistently say that Australia really exists, is that bias?
It is you that have never provided evidence or reasons why you accept evolution
Not true, but never mind.
.Whenever you and me have discussed evolution you just deny all of the evidence and reasons why I reject evolution
You have never given any evidence against ToE. Remember me asking for at least one fact? You absolutely cannot provide even one.
Why dont you admit that here? Good place for it.
"I, abe, am not able to provide even one fact contrary to ToE"
.I explain to you that based on the evidence I would reject evolution even if I was an atheist
You truly do not need to say that again. You dont know the evidence, dont understand it, and evidently no amount would ever be enough.
and yet your only response is to claim I'm ignorant about it
"only" response, and then list two.
You are in fact profoundly ignorant about it, and about earth science.
I can see you dont know that, but it is obvious to anyone who is educated.
and you appeal to majority opinion in the scientific community
So lets see. Your astonishing claim to know more than the entire world scientific community is not in any way suspect, rather, the whole problem is a logical fallacy on MY part?
.I do understand evolution and I have very legit reasons why I reject evolution and you don't hear me using the normal talking points most Christians use.I'm basing it on what honest evolutionists and former evolutionists point out and I verify it to make sure it is right.
I am aware that you think you understand it.
Meanwhile you seem to not even question evolution and just accept it while looking at things from only that perspectiv
I have read a lot of things said about evolution that I dont think are correct.
That I've not discussed them with you is hardly justification for you making up more calumny about me, like "just accept it".
.Then you expect me to provide peer reviewed reasons why evolution is not right, which you already know does not exist.
Nonsense. Of course I dont expect you to provide it. I know and you know it does not exist.
What i find so completely weird about you is that you cant take such a broad hint that there could be something wrong with your ideas.
But you just accept it while overlooking the many reasons I cannot accept it.
No, I dont "just accept it". Quit making things up. I understand it. there is a huge difference.
You dont accept it because of two things, as I see it. Your chosen reading of the bible, and your wacky ideas about evolution. If my understanding of evolution were like yours, I would not believe it either.
Also I'm not a young earth creationist so bringing up the age of ice does not apply to me.
Sure it does. The ice proves your flood never happened.