Discussion about scientific issues as they relate to God and Christianity including archaeology, origins of life, the universe, intelligent design, evolution, etc.
-
Gabrielman
- Advanced Senior Member
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:48 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
-
Has liked:
13 times
-
Been liked:
6 times
#2
Post
by Gabrielman » Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:12 pm
Ah this leaves so many new questions. Who was he married too? Where is his secrete blood line? Why do people keep desecrating graves? Are his bones holy? Why does it even matter?

Okay but seriously, what is the deal with people trying to say they have the bones of "such and such"? I mean this whole thing with the tomb of Jesus was obviously an attempt to prove Christianity wrong, so what is this? Yet another sad attempt to come? <sigh> oh well, can't wait to see the controversy and the conspiracy theories, and the assumptions they will make about him and how this proves our faith is wrong.... You know the History channel will have fun with this, before it fades into obscurity!
Once I was trapped in a perpetual night, without even a star to light the sky. Now I stand in the glory of the Son, and not even a faint shadow of darkness remains.
-
B. W.
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 8365
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:17 am
- Christian: Yes
- Location: Colorado
-
Has liked:
102 times
-
Been liked:
260 times
#3
Post
by B. W. » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:38 pm
Gabrielman wrote:
Ah this leaves so many new questions. Who was he married too? Where is his secrete blood line? Why do people keep desecrating graves? Are his bones holy? Why does it even matter?

Okay but seriously, what is the deal with people trying to say they have the bones of "such and such"...
Answer: You know, Some people just have a bone to pick...
-
-
-
Science is man's invention - creation is God's
(by B. W. Melvin)
Old Polish Proverb:
Not my Circus....not my monkeys
-
cubeus19
- Established Member
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:17 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
-
Has liked:
0
-
Been liked:
0
#4
Post
by cubeus19 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:41 am
What's odd about this is, if any secular organization or group like Cameron's wanted to use this for any anti Christian agenda how could they do it? I mean, Christians expect John the Baptist's bones to be somewhere buried since there is no record of him resurrecting from the dead (unlike Christ). So I don't know why secular groups would even want to mention this since at the very least it actually helps the case for Christianity since it confirms the earthly existence of John the Baptist. In fact this discovery reminds me of all the ancient literature, artifacts, places, and so on that have helped confirm the events of the Bible, so news like this should be more good news in our favor. Anyway, back to bed.

-
sinnerbybirth
- Established Member
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 2:26 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
-
Has liked:
0
-
Been liked:
0
#5
Post
by sinnerbybirth » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:56 am
Gabrielman wrote: Okay but seriously, what is the deal with people trying to say they have the bones of "such and such"? I mean this whole thing with the tomb of Jesus was obviously an attempt to prove Christianity wrong, so what is this?
Hey Gab,
Although I subscribe to apologetics, I almost find the debate amusing in a sort of twisted way. Athiest try there best to convince Christians there is no god. Christians try there best to convince Athiest there is a GOD. Both feed off of one another when it comes to this type of debate, for if one side didn't exist, the other side would have nothing to prove. Have Christians made Athiest? Think about it, Athiest seem to live and thrive on there attempt to disprove the need for our GOD! What other purpose do Athiest serve? It seems satin has his own army.
JMHO, Christians seem to believe because we see. Athiest cannot see, so they do not believe.
If this makes any sense great, if not, I'm still working on my first cup of coffee.

-
derrick09
- Valued Member
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:47 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Southeastern Kentucky
-
Has liked:
0
-
Been liked:
0
-
Contact:
#6
Post
by derrick09 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:54 pm
sinnerbybirth wrote:Gabrielman wrote: Okay but seriously, what is the deal with people trying to say they have the bones of "such and such"? I mean this whole thing with the tomb of Jesus was obviously an attempt to prove Christianity wrong, so what is this?
Hey Gab,
Although I subscribe to apologetics, I almost find the debate amusing in a sort of twisted way. Athiest try there best to convince Christians there is no god. Christians try there best to convince Athiest there is a GOD. Both feed off of one another when it comes to this type of debate, for if one side didn't exist, the other side would have nothing to prove. Have Christians made Athiest? Think about it, Athiest seem to live and thrive on there attempt to disprove the need for our GOD! What other purpose do Athiest serve? It seems satin has his own army.
JMHO, Christians seem to believe because we see. Athiest cannot see, so they do not believe.
If this makes any sense great, if not, I'm still working on my first cup of coffee.

Absolute pure brilliance, great point.

-
ryeguy123
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:52 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: nicolet high
-
Has liked:
0
-
Been liked:
0
#7
Post
by ryeguy123 » Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:04 am
i dought they are his bones because would the skull be detached
