Infinity and beyond!

Discussion about scientific issues as they relate to God and Christianity including archaeology, origins of life, the universe, intelligent design, evolution, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Forge
Valued Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 7:39 pm
Christian: No
Location: Watching you

Infinity and beyond!

Post by Forge »

I'm sure most people are familiar with the Kalam Cosomological Argument (Everything that has a beginning has a cause; The universe began; therefore the universe has a cause), which is based on the idea that the universe is not infinitely old.

I'm e-discussing this with someone, and I'm not sure if I'm explaining it right.

He uses an analogy that if there is a day A and a day B on an infinite timeline, separated by "five days", it would be possible to move from A to B. I say it's impossible because Infinity+5 = infinity, which is an infinite distance to cross.

but he still holds out. It goes likes this:

him wrote:No, if day A is somewhere on the timeline and B is five days later, you reach B by waiting 5 days. So the universe could well have always been.
Me wrote:NOPE.

Take an infinite timeline, defined as having no beginning or end. Also by definition, the infinite timeline holds an infinite amount of time. Also, by definition, the infinite timeline has no "point" congruous with a beginning or end.

Take A and B. A and B are separated by an amount of time. By definition, there is an infinite amount of time between A and B, since an infinite timeline with no origin holds all time. You can't say "five days separate them" since an infinite timeline includes ALL numbers, so "five days" is meaningless.
Him wrote:if there are infinite days on the timeline, there are infinite different distances between those days, the distance 5 is one of them.
Me wrote:You're not getting what I'm saying, are you?

In an actual infinity the term "five days" is meaningless, because there is no such thing as five days. You need a reference point for five days, and there is none in an infinite timeline. Think of it this way:

In an infinite timeline, A and B are separated by five days. But because they exist on an infinite timelines, the distance IS NOT five days, but rather infinity plus five... which is an infinite distance.

...
...

Lemme make a drawing.

infinity
<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

Divide this in thirds, and we get:


1/3 infinity = infinity 1/3 infinity = infinity 1/3 infinity = infinity
<----------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------->

Or add to infinity, and we get

infinity + 10 = infinity
<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

Take two arbitrary points, A and B, separated by "five days"

infinity infinity+5 = infinity infinity
<-------------------------(A)------------------------------------(B)------------------------------------>
(I also cite references from the link about the Kalam argument, but I guess he doesn't read them.
him wrote: No... I'm not saying I start at 0 with no negative numbers and try to get to infinity. I said we're here, now, and have an infinity behind us and an infinity in front of us. We won't reach any end,( nor a beginning by going back,) because the impossibility of that is what defines infinity. But you can go 5 forward, because that has nothing to do with the infinity behind it and in front of it.

...
...

no, because it's not two random points on the line and 5 days added, it's a period with an infinity behind it, and an infinity in front of it. Like this:

infinity 5 days infinity
<----------------------------------(A to B)------------------------------------>



So, am I explaining this right, or not? I'm obviously not explaining it well.
I DEMAND PIE, AND A BARREL OF WHIPPED CREAM
User avatar
Furstentum Liechtenstein
Ultimate Member
Posts: 3295
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:55 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: It's Complicated
Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Location: Lower Canuckistan

Re: Infinity and beyond!

Post by Furstentum Liechtenstein »

You may have to each define your terms. From a cursory reading of your debate, it seems to me that you are both confusing eternity with infinity.

The two are very different. Eternity cannot be divided, Infinity can.

FL
Hold everything lightly. If you don't, it will hurt when God pries your fingers loose as He takes it from you. -Corrie Ten Boom

+ + +

If they had a social gospel in the days of the prodigal son, somebody would have given him a bed and a sandwich and he never would have gone home.

+ + +
User avatar
Kurieuo
Honored Member
Posts: 10038
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:25 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Progressive Creationist
Location: Qld, Australia

Re: Infinity and beyond!

Post by Kurieuo »

Simple answer. Your right he's wrong. ;)
if there are infinite days on the timeline, there are infinite different distances between those days, the distance 5 is one of them.
5 is an infinite distance? :whistle: Contradictions always amuse me. Except when I see my own.
User avatar
DD_8630
Familiar Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:47 am
Christian: No
Sex: Male
Creation Position: I don't believe in creation

Re: Infinity and beyond!

Post by DD_8630 »

Short answer: he's right.

Long answer: The scenario sets A and B five days apart. Five days is a finite period of time. Therefore, you can go from A to B: they are only five days apart.

The fact that the timeline is infinite just means that there is neither a first nor a last day. That doesn't change the fact that two points on said timeline are a finite distance apart.

Consider the line of real numbers: the number 6 and 11 are a finite distance apart, yet the number line stretches infinitely in both directions. But do you then say that we can't go from 6 to 11? Of course not.

EDIT: Also, your explanations are treating infinity as a number; it is not.
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin

"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right."
- Stargate: SG1

"There's real poetry in the real world. Science is the poetry of reality." - Prof. Dawkins
Post Reply