abelcainsbrother wrote:Liberals like Ed are naive about Islamic terrorist attacks.But just as I've said earlier we can expect more Islamic terrorist attacks in the US because Obama and our government has ignored the FBI about how there are Islamic terrorist sleeper cells in America and they could strike out at anytime,our government ignored these warnings and are flooding our country with more Muslims and people like Ed think we who are not naive are fear-mongering about it and exxagerating the threat we face and it is no big deal.And yet just this morning in Florida we had the worst Islamic terrorist attack in America since 911 where a hundred of people were shot with 53 dead in a mass shooting in Florida in a Gay night club ( remember how liberals think they won't attack them if they are nice to Muslims?) just like in France last year. So eat your crow Ed.
I'm not naive about terrorism. I'm aware that there are people who want to kill us. However, I disagree with you on a few key points.
1. Obama isn't ignoring terrorism. He's actually been blowing them up all over the place, including inside other countries without their permission. You're spewing lies and propaganda. For the record, I don't blame you. I think you're pretty much a ventriloquist dummy.
2. The FBI isn't ignoring the possibility of terrorist attacks in the US, but that doesn't mean they'll prevent them all. That fact will become increasingly significant as the United States becomes increasingly hostile to Muslims and American Muslims become increasingly alienated. So by all means, Donald, FOX News, and conservative Christians, keep fueling those racist flames.
3. Our country is not being flooded with Muslims, and the ones coming in are very thoroughly vetted.
4. Liberals don't think that Muslim terrorists won't kill us if we're nice to them, we think that Muslim terrorists are a tiny fraction of the total Muslim community and that when conservative morons throw out blanket condemnations and propose draconian measures it makes things worse, not better. Liberals want you dangerous fools to shut the hell up and let the grown-ups handle things.
Basically, you and your presidential candidate favor a policy of reactionary stupidity, while I hope to see a logical, proactive approach.
Hortator wrote:You see, the more you respond to him, the more incensed he is to keep coming where he is not welcome and raise our blood pressures.
I'm not welcome? That's a shame. Also, incensed
is the wrong word to use there. Maybe motivated
Hortator wrote:Make no mistake, that's what he's here to do. It's his way of "getting back at fundie" for some perceived oppression in his life that he has never gotten over.
I'm here to challenge some of your assumptions, and yeah, from time to time that's likely to raise some peoples' blood pressure. So what? Some of you challenge my assumptions and raise my blood pressure pretty regularly, too. If you never want to be challenged about anything then feel free to bock me.
Hortator wrote:He doesn't need an Internet argument. He needs a counselor. Happy, well adjusted people don't pick fights with strangers. If you cared for him, you'd ignore him.
I could use more time at the gym, more sleep, more sex, and more time to myself, but all in all I'm actually pretty happy.
The fight you think I'm picking with B.W. has actually been going on for a couple of years now, and I maintain that he started it. Yes, I am dismissive of his hyperbolic, paranoid ranting, but that doesn't happen in a vacuum. Most of his ranting is about how people like me are doing our level best to destroy all that is wholesome and good, apparently because we're ignorant, naive, stupid, and possibly evil. Can you see how I might not care for that, or is that irrelevant because this is his house?