Debunking Dawkins?

Discuss strengths and weaknesses of new pages added to the God And Science website
Beanybag
Valued Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:22 am
Christian: No
Sex: It's Complicated
Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Debunking Dawkins?

#16

Post by Beanybag » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:37 am

PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
y#-o

PaulSacramento
Board Moderator
Posts: 8413
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ontario, Canada
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 298 times

Re: Debunking Dawkins?

#17

Post by PaulSacramento » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:42 am

Beanybag wrote:
PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
y#-o
Regardless of how you feel, it is a fact.
Sam Harris is not one of my favorite atheist writers ( unlike Hitchens and Dawkins when he sticks to what he knows best like in his book "greatest show on earth") simply because the man is NOT very bright and doesn't seem to grasp the true consequences of what he says.
His ignorance was taken to town by Vox Day in his book and as his "socialist naturalist" leanings are quite evident.

Post Reply