you can ask questions, i don't want to get pedantic on you, and assume that you have no spiritual understanding, when i know that you do. So, if my references are too vague, then snip, and ask for some clarification. Or just leave it there, on the ground, for someone else, maybe it isn't for you. But what you are doing here is neither one, and you have brought nothing that needs to be interpreted with you. Why not? Why not bring an example, to make your case? So then with all due respect, please don't tell me what to do, if you cannot demonstrate what it is i am not doing.RickD wrote:Please don't babble in strange tongues if there's nobody who can interpret.
And btw bbyrd009,
See what you will see. I have already testified that i see no problems with Trinity, the doctrine, and i am in complete agreement with it, so i am not sure what you mean by "theology" there, as you have now made implications that seem to deny this.RickD wrote: I see the fruit in your theology. It's chopped candied fruit and/or dried fruit, nuts, and spices.
Can you elucidate what it is about my "theology" that is--let's just face it--"wrong," in your opinion? ty