Evidence for God from Science

Anonymiss, You hit the nail on the head: ...rather they reingest their droppings so it could be further broken down enough so their bodies can better extract more out of it. It is an equivalent to chewing cud though. Hebrew scholars have pointed out that the phrase "chewing the cud" litera...

Anonymiss , Deal with the Biblical language used in Genesis 1 and 2 and then speak to me about how God used evolution. Bara means to bring into being something brand new (animals Gen. 1:21; mankind Gen. 1:27). Asa means to build it (animals Gen. 1:25; mankind gen. 1:26). Yatsar means to shape or fo...

zoegirl,

Here is a link to the 2005 paper:
http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlser ... 30110&ct=1

I believe God used a similar blueprint, but that each "species" was an original. For example at the Avalon (570 Mya) and Cambrian (543 Mya) explosions; where did God get the blueprints for all of those new Phyla? Bacteria was about all there was. What about the Triassic-Jurassic boundary? ...

The text says "and it was evening and it was morning." These are not being combined. These are two points in time. Evening closes out a work period and morning is the dawning of the next work period. See this creation account's definition Psalm 104:20-23. It is very clear that evening ends...

catherine, I hold to an old-earth creation position (day-age), but not evolution. Day five is dealing with creatures of the air and sea, not land animals. From an old-earth perspective land animals were there, but are not the focuse. Birds are a part of this day as can be seen in another creation ac...

ugo, I agree with you about the debate and discussion. :amen: I was refering to these arguments: Gen. 2:2-3 says that God rested (ceased creating) on the seventh day. God will create again when He creates the New Heavens and the New Earth. In the mean time Hebrews chapter four says we can join God i...

Ugo,

Here is a link to Dr. Ross' answer to your exact question on light.

http://www.reasons.org/resources/multim ... ives.shtml

Scroll down to the 8-31-04 air date, click on the call-in question from Burt. I think you will need RealPlayer to listen.

ugo, The Day-Age view has nothing to do with Darwinian evolution. An old earth and universe still will not support it. Yes about faith, as long as you are not meaning blind faith. As far as stats go, you were trying take make a rule of usage. I was showing that it does not work. No one said that you...

Hi ugo, Yes morning and evening are used as an analogy for the birth and death of humans in Ps. 90:3-10. This covers 70 to 80 years. Yom is used in this context of God's wrath. Regardless about the use of yom here evening and morning are used at least four times to refer to a period of time. In fact...

Hi Anonymiss, Yes Day-Age refers to the six periods of earth's formation. They are ages not 24-hour periods. As far as the chart goes, I tend to try and be more specific as to when the creative acts took place. This is by no means perfect and the end of Age three is still tricky, because of the way ...

This discussion shows why Day-Age is a better term than Progressive. As far as when God stepped in, it could be at a species level or at the genus level. Here is where more research is needed. There are about 12 ways to define a species, so it can be confusing. As far as humans evolving, I believe t...

Hello all, I would like to go back to the subject of Dr. Ross' quote about the consmological constant. He (Dr. Ross) is correct. Here are links some of his sources. The other scientist only told you part of the story. http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9706/9706227v1.pdf http://books.google.com/...