Evidence for God from Science

Audie wrote:You never addressed that.Did I say "illogical"? Tell me where I said that, or, ah, what was your charming phrase?

Not you, missy...I was mostly addressing the other Genius, BGoodForGoodSake. You may keep quiet.

What should I do to restore the joy in my life? I never knew about Chyna until now, never listened to Prince and never owned an xbox. I'm a happy guy. Don't you Christians say Something to the effect of "we're all dust" or "to everything there is a season"? You'll get over losin...

crackpot, Audie was pointing out the logical fallacy of your first statementYou seem to be missing all of his points entirely.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vpqilhW9uI re your YouTube clip: I don't have 18+ minutes of my time to Watch some guy tell me why we are smarter now than before. Why don't...

Audie wrote:No srereotyping plz.

Oklay missy I plomise not to srereotyping you

Audie wrote:I do like cats. I had one once. Guess her name?

It seems you are chinese.

When you say "I do like cats" do you mean in the gastronomic sense?

Speaking of fishing, you is thrashing about like a foul hooked alligator to get out of the clear implications of what you said:. Dear groupie, I'm sorry I insulted your Guru. Please accept my apology! I'm sure Einstein had lots of intelligent insight on God, auto mechanics and fine cuisine. Einstei...

By extension then..the unqualified Christians who hold to the reality of the flood or how evolution is false..you will agree that their opinions are without value, and that they are dingbats in those areas? You are reaching. Or fishing...Dingbats believe something to be true because their guru says...

Einstein was a physicist. He knew about physics. His thoughts on God or auto mechanics or cooking are likely on the same level as mine on these subjects: simple and largely ignorant. That people care about what Einstein said on subjects besides physics probably has more to do with his celebrity stat...

Nessa wrote: Dawkins own answer can be heard near the end of this clip

Dawkins answered the question admirably.

He evaded it admirably as well.

He's an idiot.

A Prophet for idiots.

To answer the question without political guile:

"Oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"

It is true that I am not too bright. I apologize if I have wasted your time and your prodigious intellectual prowess. What you say is true. Except I'm not an intellectual. Or smart. I just desire to know what is true and to back it up with evidence and reasoned argument. Perhaps this is unreasonabl...

By the way, dismissing this as merely an emotional argument does not get God off the hook. The emotional aspect is a CONSEQUENCE of the problem of evil. Not the SOURCE of it. The original question was just stupid. Very stupid. Have you read it? Your "argument"... An occasional interventio...

Kurieuo wrote:Is IceMobster an Atheist just because his profile reads "No" to being Christian?
Perhaps Ice can answer that one.

It doesn't matter what gobbledygook Ice believes in. If Christianity is correct, IceLobster will roast in hell just like any atheist.

Well, free of SOMETHING since many atheist that leave a religion state, quite plainly, how free the feel or how free that are now. What you describe isn't freedom but relief. Like the relief you feel after taking a laxative. Free of SOMETHING, as you say. If the newly-relieved person doesn't change...

Audie, you can't explain it to the likes of Phillip. Reminds me of a book called "Pulling down strongholds" by John Osteen in which he states how evil thoughts are of Satan ( :twisted: ), followed by much more nonsense while in the end implying that if we do not think as he sees fit (or i...

The question is dumb and is asked by an equally dumb atheist.

Nevertheless, the correct answer to this dumb question is that the Christian God is sovereign and does what he pleases according to his will.