Evidence for God from Science

Armyman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:30 pm https://www.divje-babe.si/en/the-neanderthal-flute/

Thanks... I'll have to look into this a little deeper

Armyman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:26 pm https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/nea ... discovery/

I have seen those before, but there is nothing about carving figurines or musical instruments in that link

I watched Nova's "Great Human Odyssey" recently. In this show there was a very interesting discussion on why Neanderthals went extinct in Europe while Modern Humans survived. Modern Humans and Neanderthals coexisted in the same environment and evidently interbred on rare occasions. Anthro...

Until we see empirically observable evidence that beneficial mutations are able to produce coordinated adds and substitutions at a rate orders of magnitude faster than the observed capability of non-beneficial mutations, then the observable evidence indicates that the capability of non-beneficial m...

I watched Nova's "Great Human Odyssey" recently. In this show there was a very interesting discussion on why Neanderthals went extinct in Europe while Modern Humans survived. Modern Humans and Neanderthals coexisted in the same environment and evidently interbred on rare occasions. Anthrop...

Until we see empirically observable evidence that beneficial mutations are able to produce coordinated adds and substitutions at a rate orders of magnitude faster than the observed capability of non-beneficial mutations, then the observable evidence indicates that the capability of non-beneficial m...

Stipulating to your statement: "That doesn’t mean that every case with beneficial mutations is more rapid than some case with non-beneficial mutations." Do you agree with the following statement... In order to create the tree of life, the number of empirically observable examples of combi...

Stipulating to your statement: "That doesn’t mean that every case with beneficial mutations is more rapid than some case with non-beneficial mutations." Do you agree with the following statement... In order to create the tree of life, the number of empirically observable examples of combi...

What I wrote about was an imagined example where there is one case with possible non-beneficial mutations and one case with possible beneficial mutations and I compared the rate between these two specific cases. The motive for this example was to show that there are two different mechanisms, one li...

The conclusion is that the frequency of the combination of non-beneficial mutations (for instance in the malaria bacteria) says nothing about the frequencies of combinations of beneficial mutations. I understand the premise perfectly well... Here are the assumptions... 1. A string of non-beneficial...

The malaria case shows that six non-beneficial coordinated mutations exceeds the capability of the number of life forms that have ever existed on this plan. Do you agree? Absolutely :) If you agree that is what I think is important in Issue1 In your response you argue like this (assuming you agree)...

Happy New Year to you too! You discuss Issue 1 so let’s concentrate on that. I wrote: “Issue 1. The malaria case. You mention often the malaria case where two non-beneficial mutations is needed to provide resistance to chloroquine. From that you (following Behe) argue that if four or more non-benef...

Issue 3. Lenski’s experiment show according to you that “the overwhelming majority of beneficial mutations that do occur in nature and in the lab degrade genetic information” (#58). Assuming you are correct it still doesn’t follow what you continue with: “I think it is even more "wrong" t...

We have discussed the issues above at length. It’s not meaningful to continue the discussion if your argument is: 1. “It has been shown in nature and the lab” referring to the Malaria case and E Coli experiment. and from that you make a giant leap to the conclusion: 2. “Then the billions of coordin...

Happy New Year! :) I hope you had an enjoyable Holiday season Let me address a couple of your comments and come back to the rest later. As I got some time to read our discussion from the beginning it seem that we perhaps are coming close to a point where it’s of no use continuing the discussion. It ...