Evidence for God from Science

Yes, but Christian beleifs were behind the Spanish Inquisition. How does that relate to either ID or evolution, which you brought up, since neither was around at that time? We can also debate the meaning of Christian :) It doesn't, if you remember you brought up the Nazi's and I replied "Will ...

I do because ID is trying to conform existing beliefs with those discovered through scientific processes. The discoveries made through these processes are an outcome of unbiased observation. Sorry, observation was not unbiased, it was biased towards the ToE for the last 100 or so years. And you hav...

Will arguing about ID over evolution prevent a new Nazi regime? Creating a red herring when you don't want to answer the question? And it could conceiveably have prevented the first holocaust, since Nazi dogma was based on survival of the fittest, i.e. natural selection. Yes, but Christian beleifs ...

August wrote:
Or how do you see it differently?

I do because ID is trying to conform existing beliefs with those discovered through scientific processes.

The discoveries made through these processes are an outcome of unbiased observation.

Look into your own heart and perhaps you will see what is right and what is wrong? Don't you think this is a problem though? Did the Nazis look into their own hearts and see nothing wrong? Without an objective source of right and wrong, there can be much pain and suffering. Will arguing about ID ov...

You really don't know what you're talkling about. Astronomy is operational science, evolution and ID are origin science. Also, ID isn't made out of ignorance, it's made out of what we currently know (such as the fact that mutation rates don't allow for rapid evolution...and their is no reason to sa...

It doesn't really matter how I know.

I can only say that I feel that I should not add to the suffering of the world.

Look into your own heart and perhaps you will see what is right and what is wrong?

Such things as rapid evolution and irreducible complexity are merely limitations to current understanding. It may point to a god but science cannot say for sure that it is God who is the cause. In other words within the paradigm of science we cannot reach a road block and use that as an explanation....

This logic only works if you take the Bible as truth. Open up your mind, some people do not accept this truth and so logically does not reach the same conclusion. So who are you then calling illogical? Realize this first, and perhaps you will have a better chance of converting the unbeliever. What ...

We have to remember that most of the people in this country who believe in evolution happen to be Christians. Evolution isn't necessarily anti-God or anti-Bible, because God could have created or guided the process. The problem lies when teachers teach evolution with an atheist angle. "because...

You cannot Debunk Intelligent Design, if you think you can you do not understand science. Seems like you understand neither ID nor the scientific method very well. Please give your summary of what you understand ID to be. Intelligent Design is the use of pattern recognition to prove that a designer...

[quote="Thinker]Without law, people will do whatever they want whenever they want. I guess it just comes to to morals now.[/quote]

Are you so certain that it is the laws which came first or was it morality?

It DOESN'T take mathematical, biological, or any other scientific research but the Bible to show that either evolution is false as we know it, or it is true, but done by a divine hand that formed it. I see it there. A real logical thinker can see this, apparently darwinian evolutionists don't. :lol...

You cannot Debunk Intelligent Design, if you think you can you do not understand science. On the flip side, the reason Intelligent design cannot be discussed in a scientific journal is because of the same reason. You cannot disprove it so therefore it is not in the realm of scientific thinking. What...