Evidence for God from Science

http://www.biblebb.com/

The above site contain quite a number of topics, one of which deal with your questions.
However, I do recommend that you look for other resources that present "the other point of view".

bob2010 wrote:check out Proverbs 8:21-22 and Colossians 1:16-17

sorry, I don't get the point from the 2 quotes?

No UFO?

Is God then a collective term....like people, herd

How do we reconcile Gen 1:26 with the One God concept?

Just a point to note. Only creeping creatures were brought into the ark. Those that can swim can jolly remain in the ocean during those time, so penguin likely stays in the ocean. The other thing to note is that it's likely we are only talking about the type of animals, not their specific category, ...

Thks kateliz.

Just came back onto this site after 1 month absence. Your reference was helpful indeed.

I don't think the perfect refer to Christ as the verse uses "which" for perfect. It could however refer to the period after Christ return. I just heard another line of thots. Base on v8, what is being talk about has to do with the word. 1 Cor 13:8 Charity never faileth: but whether there b...

1Co 13:10
But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

What that's all about is that the prostitute people have assumed was Mary Magdalene was mentioned just above where she herself was mentioned. The two were confused for the same person. I thought, (because I was taught this like just about everyone else in the western world, maybe,) that Mary was th...

What if His marriage is not a result of him satisfying his fleshly desire, but as part of the plan to live out a holy life & marriage (in demo to all of us)?

I've not read the book, but what's wrong with Jesus having a kid with Mary?

If they actually got arried legally, I don''t see how marriage & having children affect the salvation plan of God or the character of God in human form.

Can anyone enlighten?

AttentionKMartShoppers wrote:Though on its own the argument is rather weak, it is a good addition to the evidence against animals going to heaven in the Bible.

Do explain the weakness if this argument is stand alone.

just to add a new thot to the topic. Base on the book of Job, it is interesting to note that at the end of it all, what Job had lost, he got back double....all except his children....which was the exct number he lost. One theory to that is that human are everlasting. Job did not in effect lost his c...

KJV 4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they c...