Evidence for God from Science

Danieltwotwenty wrote:You just proved my point.

Like so many before me, my time on this board is done.

awww come on bro dont leave.

I appreciate the question, but let me ask you one back, though. How much looking have you done into the matter? I ask because when you so bluntly declare that there is no evidence, that implies that you are done a rather exhaustive search. But in light of that, your question doesn't sound so forthr...

Jac3510 wrote:And you just proved mine!

haha ya your not arrogant at all

well what would you say to someone who is real sincere about those questions?

I didn't watch the first video, but I agree on the evolution of the eye. I don't think you will find many here who accept this though. There is an evolution resource thread I started some time back it has excellent source material if you are intrested. yes i went over that, looks like you put a lot...

I appreciate the question, but let me ask you one back, though. How much looking have you done into the matter? I ask because when you so bluntly declare that there is no evidence, that implies that you are done a rather exhaustive search. But in light of that, your question doesn't sound so forthr...

I didn't watch the first video, but I agree on the evolution of the eye. I don't think you will find many here who accept this though. There is an evolution resource thread I started some time back it has excellent source material if you are intrested. yes i went over that, looks like you put a lot...

I would just say that there is evidence for a global flood, and that you should be very careful with "there's no way" type arguments. The onus is on you to prove such a universal is true, and on the flip side, even if I don't know a way, then that doesn't mean that there is not in fact a way. For i...

Why are you guys trying to get Daniel all riled up? Daniel, Just ignore them. They're big bullies! Bob: I believe the flood was global because that is what the Bible actually says Frank: SHUTUPYOUBIGBULLY :econfused: :wave: Well how would you answer these questions? exept the species can fit on the...

ok kool

I don't understand how he means if you think the floods global that you reject psalm 104. I don't see psalm saying it was global.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwew5gHo ... r_embedded

http://www.wimp.com/eyeevolution/
What do you think of this?

Alright thanks. But how would you show them that are bible is different from all other cults?

Could use some help on how to answer this in the best way y:-/ How is the bible proof of it any more than the qu'ran is proof of their god? By this logic, we could also conclude that Laws of Manu is proof of Shiva, Vishni or Devi. Since the epic of gilgamesh is a known, proven ancient artifact, how ...

oh ok that makes a little more sense