Evidence for God from Science

seveneyes, It may have been the point that God decided (from outside of time) to allow the first actulizer to begin, but since creation began outside of time, it could literally come from any point in the past present or future to make that actualizer begin. So maybe God allowed the first actulizer...

You know what I am curious about, is that nature seems to balance itself. If a population grows too large, weather, catastrophe like fires or other natural disasters, predation, disease or whatever, seems to come along and correct the imbalance just perfectly. I wonder if human beings ever get to th...

The fossil record is complete? Come now, Bibby, that's garbage. If the fossil record were complete we wouldn't find new fossils. We find new fossils every year, and knowing several paleontologists myself, I can stand to say that they would have no jobs if our fossil record were "complete."...

Time being relative is almost like if someone asked the question: "how fast is 60mph?" I would say it is that you go 60 land miles in 1 hour, that is the speed. But how fast is that really? The question then becomes compared to what? 60mph is relatively slow to say the speed of a planet mo...

But what does that have to do with evolution? Because evolution hinges on timelines. If time is not exactly as evolutionary theory assumes it is, or has not been constant as they assume, finding these things out would change our entire view on the universe. Think of it. We find out that the 13.7 bi...

I appreciate the sentiments dayage, but I think you are missing the point of the things that I was saying for the most part. God isn't lying for the fact that he created time to be relative. Did you know that an electron around a stable nucleus (hydrogen atom at constant temperature) goes around it ...

So you would scientifically appeal to the concept of "don't try because you can't figure it out."? If historically scientists used that reasoning to describe the complex things in life, it is unlikely we'd be alive today to talk about it. Well, maybe 1 in 5 of us would be around. Also, I ...

Pierson5. I don't have any religious beliefs. Religion in the sense of a regimental dogmatic tradition for capitalistic spirituality. I truly believe that religion enslaves men, while the truth sets you free. True belief in Christ is not religion. in fact Christ was outspoken against religion. Havin...

Seveneyes wrote: I truly believe that the more mankind learns about time, the more the theory of evolution will be turned upside down. Could you explain the connection? Look at my above post concerning black holes. It is theorized that the center of our galaxy is a black hole. The circulating star ...

But that makes no sense. Why not just create the final product and avoid millions of years of repeated death and failure? also, I must point out that, presuming there were millions of years of this cycle, there was no evil on Earth yet. It had not been created, and thus, unless this somehow prepare...

seveneyes wrote: . . . science can conclude that there are things that have always been and will always be . . . [/color] Such as? Anything in the eternal realms. The physical universe is finite, but where the physical universe ends its cause begins, from things that have no beginning or end. It is...

Again, it is a stretch to say that Angels are neither physical or spiritual. We know that they are spiritual beings. As far as them appearing as physical, we can only say that they can appear as physical, but existing as physical would be a different story. We have only heard of angels appearing as ...

By His will I meant will to create time (or start to count). If His will did not change then throughout His timelessness He was decided to create time. Ok, I take my point 2 back and replace it. Then: 1. If time is change then the time interval relates to change of something from one state to anoth...

One other thing to consider here. If a planet was being sucked in by a black hole it would experience a slowing of time. Those on the planet would never see themselves ever getting sucked up- millions of years would pass in their view, but an outside observer would see the planet totally disappear a...

Just to jump in real fast- science can conclude that there are things that have always been and will always be, just that in the physical universe, this is impossible. -The "logical" argument that even God had to have a beginning isn't logical anymore... Funny how logic fails with the ligh...