Search found 319 matches

by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:25 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Flaws in Evolution
Replies: 246
Views: 43416

Zenith,

You listed some nice information, but none of it supports evolution, again, especially when talking about humans.
So, how do you think the first white people came to be...
No, it's not because of mutation. Apparently, you don't know what is being discussed here.
by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:55 am
Forum: Moral and Ethical Affairs
Topic: A different homosexuality thread
Replies: 8
Views: 3211

I agree.
by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:53 am
Forum: Christian Chit-chat
Topic: Biochip=Mark of the Beast?
Replies: 31
Views: 10152

Makes more sense. I will begin my own research.
by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:51 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Flaws in Evolution
Replies: 246
Views: 43416

Variability is what evolution is supposed to work on. Anthropomorphizing again? I don't think evolution is working on anything. This thread was criticizing macroevolution. In that case, humans have nothing to do with this discussion. The differences between family members is less than that of stran...
by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:40 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Love
Replies: 32
Views: 7871

Is your point of showing the limitations of science somehow an effort to discredit it?
Why, certainly not! Why would you say such a thing!?
by Mystical
Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:38 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: A New ANTI-Evolution website!!!
Replies: 58
Views: 14757

No, it is correct. Genes guide the encoding and development of proteins. Evolution does not predict that specific sequences have specific functions. Evolution doesn't predict anything. It is the variation in sequence that actually bolsters the theory. No, it doesn't. Variation in gene sequence doesn...
by Mystical
Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:09 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: A New ANTI-Evolution website!!!
Replies: 58
Views: 14757

Care to explain then why a gene would have different sequences, when the gene's function is identical in each organism? If evolution was accurate, the same function would accompany the same sequences. Especially if all life came from one source. So, I ask you, why? And, does your question really ma...
by Mystical
Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:55 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Love
Replies: 32
Views: 7871

I'm not sure that I would agree with your analysis that science cannot define or prove love. I think they can measure the changes in the brain that are an indication of love, but they cannot "prove" that someone loves or how love arises. Love's effects can be observed, but not love itself...
by Mystical
Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:41 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Love
Replies: 32
Views: 7871

Because science is not the be all and end all to human knowledge. It is only one of the tools at our disposal.
Ahhh...so refreshing that you finally realize that. :P
by Mystical
Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:39 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Flaws in Evolution
Replies: 246
Views: 43416

Who brought humans into this discussion? We are irrelevant to it. There are no different species of humans; just on species: humans. So, humans in a discussion of evolution is pointless. Two other things: human DNA is incredibly stable. There is virtually no difference between different races in dif...
by Mystical
Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:39 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: A New ANTI-Evolution website!!!
Replies: 58
Views: 14757

I mean this with no disrespect, perhaps your not analytically inclined. I knew you would be upset by that whole platypus issue. :lol: But I think you're wrong again. Because you haven't said anything still...red or not (maybe you should try another color and see what happens). You know analytical s...
by Mystical
Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:27 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Love
Replies: 32
Views: 7871

If science can't define or prove love, why is it's existence acknowledged?
by Mystical
Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:41 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: A New ANTI-Evolution website!!!
Replies: 58
Views: 14757

BGood: That really doesn't say much. Mastrini: People are sometimes born with scales. Does that mean we once lived in the water? I'll have to read more of your site, but I didn't see much convincing information. I am sure it will be just as accurate as the human evolutionary timeline or the horse. :...
by Mystical
Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:33 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Love
Replies: 32
Views: 7871

Do you know what emotions they attribute to love? I've begun to learn that love is more action than a feeling, and definately not lust.
by Mystical
Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:31 pm
Forum: Christian Chit-chat
Topic: Biochip=Mark of the Beast?
Replies: 31
Views: 10152

I'm not headed anywhere so I don't have any scripture. It's what I've always heard people say. Maybe someone else can supply scripture?