Evidence for God from Science

Genesis is a theological account of creation so, the actual time frame is irrelevant since the authour probably didn't have that in mind when he wrote it. Basically and theologically speaking, God created the world over a period of time that was "divided" in 7 stages. This statement is op...

This is the argument brought against me every time on this subject. It goes something like this: Human populations did not grow because of ..... We do have much of that data. It's easy to see that from that the rate was slower due to elements such as a higher mortality rate in birth , a shorter life...

It's less relevant what it was 100,000 years ago when compared to the last 100 years than what it was in the centuries immediately prior. How so? I believe a span of 100,00 years is very important in my original post. I am not arguing the last 100 years. a higher mortality rate in birth This is a s...

Well to use the author's own words This is a completely ridiculous argument, based upon faulty assumptions and faulty data. Lets examine the data he presents: The assumption is that the average family size has always been the same and that the population growth rate has always been 2%. It is actuall...

One Topic I brought up a few years ago is the thought on Human population growth when comparing Evolution theory to YEC theory. In short Evolution theory IMO has a serious problem trying to explain the fact that "modern man" which they would say has existed somewhere between 100,000 years ...

I believe if you take all the "evidence" as a whole: Old art work (sometimes reffered to as "OOPART" (out of place art), Old writings before we ever assembled a dinosaur skeleton. And yes even the book of JOB, you could come to the conclusion that man has seen and lived with dino...