Evidence for God from Science

Philip, Byblos was responding specifically to what you said here: Mary was the physical mother of the human shell that Jesus took on. Period! From reading what you wrote, it seems you're saying that Mary was the mother of only the physical or human "part" of Jesus. Mary was the mother of the person ...

Mary was the physical mother of the human shell that Jesus took on. Period! The Nestorians thought the same thing and they were deemed heretics, do you know why? Ooh, ooh, ooh, I know, I know, I know!! Can I answer? Nestorians believed in the disunity of the two natures of Christ. I was in a long d...

Homo erectus is the scientific name for a gay Neanderthal.

As I get older im starting to reflect on my last 4 decades. Im trying to piece things together and make sense of it all. I definitely struggle with things on a daily basis. I do come from a religious background. Other things happened that started making me ask my own questions tho. I am dead set th...

Kurieuo wrote: Truly, this position seems more of a stretch to me than The Gap. K, I really can't compare the two. If I can be blunt, I think the Gap Theory has no scientific evidence behind it. And the Gap Theory basically butchers scripture. It may be my bias because I'm a progressive creationist...

Has no one got any comment on this? Surely it has huge implications for evolutionary theory if all current species are only 100,000 - 200,000 years old. Even the studies participants fought against the results initially, but they had to relent when that is what the data showed. If true, then it see...

claysmithr wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:58 am

I just find it hard to love my neighbor, especially when it seems they don't love me back.

Maybe your neighbor is an angel who is having sexual relations with your female neighbor. That may be why you have a difficult time loving your neighbor. I find it difficult to love fallen angels too.

Has no one got any comment on this? Surely it has huge implications for evolutionary theory if all current species are only 100,000 - 200,000 years old. Even the studies participants fought against the results initially, but they had to relent when that is what the data showed. If true, then it see...

Has no one got any comment on this? Surely it has huge implications for evolutionary theory if all current species are only 100,000 - 200,000 years old. Even the studies participants fought against the results initially, but they had to relent when that is what the data showed. If true, then it see...

My wife comes from a catholic family.

She's the youngest of 6.

And her dad had 10 siblings.

Kurieuo wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 20, 2018 5:24 am

My wife tells me she looks after five kids, but we've only had four so I don't know what she's on about.

It's nice when a woman knows her place.

I was not speaking of Moses. I never knew he believed in pre-adamites. As a matter of fact, I belive The Original Hebrew Israelites were Black. I was referring to the pre-adamism doctrine popularized by Europeans in recent centuries, the bullcorn that says only whites come from Adam, i.e. the so-ca...

Also, DB, I think you should take all of the mentions in Scripture that MIGHT tie Adam and Eve to all mankind - like the naming of Eve noted Genesis 3:20: "The man called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living ." As this statement would SEEM to mean that Eve was the mother of...

Also, DB, I think you should take all of the mentions in Scripture that MIGHT tie Adam and Eve to all mankind - like the naming of Eve noted Genesis 3:20: "The man called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living ." As this statement would SEEM to mean that Eve was the mother of...

I was not speaking of Moses. I never knew he believed in pre-adamites. As a matter of fact, I belive The Original Hebrew Israelites were Black. I was referring to the pre-adamism doctrine popularized by Europeans in recent centuries, the bullcorn that says only whites come from Adam, i.e. the so-ca...