Evidence for God from Science

zoegirl, I thought you were going to be a new friend. I asked you to use the same level of sarcasm and incredulty as I, in the hope that we might communicate in a friendly way. Whereas you might have had a chance to convince me my thinking was uninformed or just plain wrong had you remained calm eno...

My new friend, Zoegirl, let's look at Archer's argument regarding the length of the 6th day from your last post, and treat it fairly but critically. Note that Richard Deem makes the same general argument in his article, "The Literal Interpretation of the Genesis One Creation Account" http:...

Zoegirl, I will be convinced when you have demonstrated your position is correct. I will not quit because you show my position is incorrect. I have stated from the start that I do not take the plain read approach dogmatically. I have stated I am not simply anti OEC and I am not simply pro YEC. I am ...

Points well taken, Fürstentum Liechtenstein. I confess that the placement of childish icons and different fonts on the board by its host has led my peurile mind astray. When no one responded to my thoughts when exressed with a normal font, I thought I might get a response with a big font. It serves ...

Zoegirl, is that what the purpose of this forum is, to just spout off?

We do not say that Genesis is an allegory or untrue, merely that God took a long time based on the evidence we find. http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/sixdays.html Ms. zoegirl. I have great respect for you for responding to my post. I have been very critical in my main 2 posts. But I am tryin...

Re: Age of Star Light by Gman on Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:18 pm No one here is calling God a liar nor his word... What it basically boils down to is a skewed interpretation of God's word. The young earthers go to a skewed interpretation of Genesis then try to "fit" science into it. It is not p...

Jon W. Greene wrote the article you referred me to. I guess I assumed it was your article, and, as your moniker is Gman, without thinking about it I assumed you were Mr. Green. Didn't mean anything by it.

Thank you, Jon, for responding to my post. Since you took the time, so kindly, to write, I want to respond to your points, including your article from the GodandScience website, which you incorporate by reference, especially since it "explains it best." This will take a bit of time, becaus...

Hi, I am new to this forum. I'd like to invite a conversation about the very broad topic which forms the very premise of the GodandScience website: How does one reconcile the legitimate practice of science with the legitimate worship of the God of the Bible? I come as a student of the Bible with mor...