Evidence for God from Science

Its all a matter of flawed mindset.

* Taxonomics Species can be objectively classified into a nested hierarchy. This results in a branching tree, in which certain traits are found only at a certain branch and beyond (e.g. birds have feathers, mammals don't; seeds are found only in certain types of plants). It was known that species c...

For the species creation part, Darwinian Evolutionists will tell you a "new" species have been created. They will point to evidence such as experiments with fruit-flies (one of the major ones), the so-called "evolved" fruit-fly population y could not interbreed with pre-existing ...

I believe uncommondescent took this up here: http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/wired/

Yeah, I understand, and I have considered this in the past. I just don't think I could do it, though. And isn't fish so good for us? I say that because I love sushi, and would find that hard to give up! Sushi is wonderful and addicting. I had to give it up. Can't afford such luxuries anymore. Beans...

But then he told Noah that He gave humans the animals to eat (Gen 9:2-3). Ha ha, after he just saved them all. God would be providing food for humans in the long run ( as the animal population would grow ) by saving His creation. My point though is that originally we were intended to be herbivores,...

Humans seem to be designed to be herbivores (flat nails, teeth etc...). I've never thought about it much but now that I've thought about it I think its time to switch to consuming strictly fruits, vegetables and you know, all that healthy stuff and without the bloody mess. God blessed them and said ...

Suggestion: If you want to make the font bigger on demand without actually changing the font, then just press and hold CTRL button and use scroll on mouse wheel.

And on the off-chance anyone does, the obvious next question would be ""where did SuperGod come from?"

Would you assume the laws of causality must chain and apply beyond the created universe, if God created it?

hawkdrivermtp wrote:I am pretty certain that this is actually a video using a camera inside someones body. But that is my guess. I saw this on YouTube the other day and someone else shared my same conclusion. Either way, it is not really eye friendly...

BINGO!

Its also expected that if two of the same types of master templates are seperated between continents (isolated from each other) that overtime expected results in parallel comparisons (of form and function) should be relatively indistinguishable with only minor variabilities or minimal offset. Well,...

On the curious about Darwinian Evoluiton thread, Bgood (a geneticist) asked me to provide a`clear cut definition of front-loading. I thought it would be a good idea to create a new thread dedicated to front-loading rather then Darwinian Evolution in general. Front-loading is an idea that has been fl...

Hi Bgood, I'm sure there are different definitions floating around there. Here is the way I see it: Front-loading, an act of concentrating proactively substantial biological knowledge (specified functional information - a master template ) into a info-processing system that overtime will generate de...

My using baloney for a bad argument (which I HAVE read) is not OK, but your calling Judge Jones lazy and prejudiced is OK? I got it. Yes, he was atleast misinformed, lazy? probably. I have seen Darwinists to this day still do not understand what ID is about. I suspect massive confusion played a rol...

I did not fail to see anything. Any objections you raise seem to be futile in comparison. It should be trivial for you to demonstrate how they came about via RM & NS, especially the RM part. It should be trivial for you to demonstrate that they are useless genes that are not loaded for future co...