Evidence for God from Science

With that said, what I'm arguing is that we can use Hume's argument to our advantage. What he rightly shows is that either 1) a composite being can be a necessary being, or else 2) only a simple being can be a necessary being. If we insist God is composite, we must opt for the former, but in that c...

What Hume points out, though, is that if we allow this kind of "necessity," then there is nothing preventing us from making the same claim about the universe. The universe certainly appears contingent. Things in our daily experience are obviously contingent. Yet if we are to allow by fiat...