Evidence for God from Science

I think Kenny and atheists like him need to stay in a Haunted House.There are haunted houses and places in every State of America where people have experienced ghosts,spirits,orbs flying through the air,paranormal activity,poltergeist activity,etc. People even hire Christian experts and mediums to ...

I think Kenny and atheists like him need to stay in a Haunted House.There are haunted houses and places in every State of America where people have experienced ghosts,spirits,orbs flying through the air,paranormal activity,poltergeist activity,etc. People even hire Christian experts and mediums to ...

Rick: This conversation has pretty much run its course. Unless you have something different to add, I feel like I'm just repeating what I've said before. Absolutely! Ken's irrational, constantly silly, contradictory, non-relevant / nonsensical answers have, at this point, been redundantly exposed i...

Kenny wrote: Providing a definition of science does not mean tools will never advance to the level of working. How do you know they will never advance to the point of working? What will prevent this? Eyeglasses were never meant to be used as a hearing aid. Science wasn't meant to be the study of th...

Kenny wrote: First of all, we were discussing TOOLS of science, not the definition of science. I asked him how does he know tools of science will never be able to detect things in his spiritual world, after all 150 years ago, nobody was able to detect germs at the microscopic level (microworld) but...

Ken: As I said before, if such a world DID exist, and were discovered, it would be labeled physical. NO it would not - unless the definition of physical is expanded to include things with characteristics that are NOT physical, and physical tools cannot detect the non-physical realm! Then name somet...

Philip wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 11:32 pm How long will it before you finally realize that SCIENTIFIC tools are totally limited to the analysis of physical things and phenomena? Kenny wrote: How do you know this? As you have been shown before, we know this because of what science is. And how do we k...

Ken: 150 years ago, the discovery of germs and how they cause disease was beyond the capabilities and tools of science. Eventually scientists advanced to the point that it was not.[/quote] Yes, tools of PHYSICAL analysis have come into existence, have continued to become more and more sophisticated...

Ken: 150 years ago, the discovery of germs and how they cause disease was beyond the capabilities and tools of science. Eventually scientists advanced to the point that it was not. Yes, tools of PHYSICAL analysis have come into existence, have continued to become more and more sophisticated at meas...

That's because as far as they know nothing exists outside the observable material world. My point is, if they found something outside this world they could address, they would address it. How do they know that and how would they address it? Whatever method they used to discover it, that method woul...

That's because as far as they know nothing exists outside the observable material world. My point is, if they found something outside this world they could address, they would address it. How do they know that and how would they address it? Whatever method they used to discover it, that method woul...

Ken: My point is, if they found something outside this world they could address, they would address it. HOW Ken - and why even reference ANY aspect that involves science that is beyond the capabilities of its methodologies and tools???!!! 150 years ago, the discovery of germs and how they cause dis...

No Kenny, Please site scientific evidence of the non-material world. There is none. No scientific evidence for the spiritual world, God, or any type of eternal being. But that isn't going to stop some people from believing. So, science can NOT make a statement in regards to the non-material existen...

And my position, which you fail to understand, is that science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. So, science cannot, EVER, be the study of God, because God...

kenny wrote: I think this is where we need to agree to disagree. You believe the spiritual world (and God) exists, and I believe they do not, and we are discussing the ability of science in the context of what we believe. First, that's not how "agree to disagree" works. You need to understand my po...