Evidence for God from Science

The strongest argument for God? I would point to the fact that most people believe in some type of God/higher power. Sorta like popularity as an indicator of truth.

Ken

Why does it matter (pun)? Same reason it matters if something came later in time. If energy isn't self-existing then there is something more foundational than it, which moves it, gives it form as this energy or that, and hence matter itself. Ergo Materialism is falsified. I’m not getting this. If w...

Why does it matter (pun)? Same reason it matters if something came later in time. If energy isn't self-existing then there is something more foundational than it, which moves it, gives it form as this energy or that, and hence matter itself. Ergo Materialism is falsified. I’m not getting this. If w...

If something exists, something's always existed. God by definition is said to be that "something" possessing aseity (self-existence). To to ask the question what existed before the something that self-exists is nonsense and shows misunderstanding. And, if one says it is illogical to believe somethi...

Why does that seem to matter so much to them? Why really care what Believers think? y:-? I also care about this question If you are my neighbor, what you think about me, what you believe about me has an effect on my life. Ken Probably why some believers feel the "need" to convert non-believers. Unf...

If something exists, something's always existed. God by definition is said to be that "something" possessing aseity (self-existence). To to ask the question what existed before the something that self-exists is nonsense and shows misunderstanding. And, if one says it is illogical to believe somethi...

dand wrote: ↑

Tue May 01, 2018 7:04 am

Philip wrote: ↑

Fri May 19, 2017 5:52 pm

Why does that seem to matter so much to them? Why really care what Believers think?

I also care about this question

If you are my neighbor, what you think about me, what you believe about me has an effect on my life.

Ken

I posted a challenge to Atheists several years ago to discuss the Nature of Reality. What is it ultimately? Many seem unable to move beyond a Materialistic view, although physical laws are clearly defined moving them to Physicalism since such is undeniable. Nonetheless many strongly support a Mater...

Kenny you may need to know that atheists are now claiming that we have no free-will and cannot make decisions for ourselves. It is something new I'm having to deal with when debating atheists. Yeah; a lot of them are Democrats too! Something I’ve been having to deal with when debating some of those...

Kenny you may need to know that atheists are now claiming that we have no free-will and cannot make decisions for ourselves. It is something new I'm having to deal with when debating atheists. Yeah; a lot of them are Democrats too! Something I’ve been having to deal with when debating some of those...

The argument about Me 1. How I a now depends on how I was at some earlier time some moments ago and the environment between that earlier time and now (and on nothing else). I think the actions you’ve engaged in between the earlier time vs now can determine who you are right now; also. I said and me...

It makes no sense to me that people are angry at those who believe in Christ - unless they are somehow being hurt by them. Because those truly following Christ are practicing love, kindness, and benevolence toward their fellow man. I said " those who believe in God " not everybody who believes in G...

Dawkins hates and resents God. He might claim not to believe God exists, but then nonetheless his contempt and hatred can be felt when he's discussing such, face-to-face with a believer or taking to his fellow non-believers. He may resent and have contempt, I am not sure because I don't know the ex...

the other part of your comment is full of t(1) t(x=+1) and a host of other algebra type symbols. I am having difficulty understanding what you are saying when you speak this way. Perhaps you can make your point differently, or perhaps this is something we can just agree to disagree on Ken, I was wo...

Did you read his original post about that which I quoted above? Which post # are you referring to? My post #401 - I deleted the post number off his :oops: Yes I remember that one; as a matter of fact, I believe that was the one I responded to on #386. I was okay with that one, but after that things...