Re: Should Neanderthals be called their own species or a subspecies of Homo Sapiens?
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:56 pm
I will try to give my perspective from both a biblical and scientific perspective.
I have already explained how I know there were pre-Adamits races before man already,so I won't explain that again.You can review.But based on the bible man is a unique and new creation,despite the fact there were homnids and Cro-Magnons.
Based on the bible Adam and his lineage began as tillers of the soil and herdsmen after the fall of Adam.The first indication of hunting does not appear until after Noah's flood.If the Paleoclimate data is valid and the biblical timeline of Adam and modern man is valid,we must conclude it was not the descendants of Adam and Eve who hunted the now extinct Mammoths.Those who did so were a race of manlike beings which were on the earth before Adam and Eve - The pre-Adamite race of hoiminds not made in the "image of God"So then in whose image were they made?
With DNA testing the supporting proof for this is coming to light much to the consternation of evolutionary uniformitarianism school of human origins. For example,DNA testing of Neanderthal remains clearly shows that modern man is not descended from the Neanderthal.The DNA from three different sets of Neanderthal remains showed that there is no genetic link between modern man and the Neanderthal. Plus Neanderthal skull characteristics further confirm this. Keep in mind that these scientists are looking at it from an evolution perspective and it forced them to statt looking back even further in the fossil record to try to find a common ancestor or missing link branch from the primates.They won't find it.
Then there is Cro-magnon "anatomically modern human" found in Australia and has revealed that it was atleast 60,000 years old and had a mitochondrial DNA gentic marker that is now extinct.So that nobody is descended from that particular line of beings,atleast on the female side.
Although there have been found in the DNA of some of the earth's modern human populstion,this does not prove conclusively that Neanderthal and modern man mated sometime in the past.There is another plausible biblical explanation and how in the bible angels always appeared to man as men and we know fallen angels produced hybrid giant off-spring - Giants - in Genesis 6. So there is biblical reasons to know that the powers of darkness understand something about genetics in order to be able to produce these hybrids. There are other biblical examples that back this up too,but I digress. And so angels were probably up to their same evil deeds in the former world too.
Evolutionary mainline science still cannot provide a fully satisfactory answer to the origins of modern man.
I have already explained how I know there were pre-Adamits races before man already,so I won't explain that again.You can review.But based on the bible man is a unique and new creation,despite the fact there were homnids and Cro-Magnons.
Based on the bible Adam and his lineage began as tillers of the soil and herdsmen after the fall of Adam.The first indication of hunting does not appear until after Noah's flood.If the Paleoclimate data is valid and the biblical timeline of Adam and modern man is valid,we must conclude it was not the descendants of Adam and Eve who hunted the now extinct Mammoths.Those who did so were a race of manlike beings which were on the earth before Adam and Eve - The pre-Adamite race of hoiminds not made in the "image of God"So then in whose image were they made?
With DNA testing the supporting proof for this is coming to light much to the consternation of evolutionary uniformitarianism school of human origins. For example,DNA testing of Neanderthal remains clearly shows that modern man is not descended from the Neanderthal.The DNA from three different sets of Neanderthal remains showed that there is no genetic link between modern man and the Neanderthal. Plus Neanderthal skull characteristics further confirm this. Keep in mind that these scientists are looking at it from an evolution perspective and it forced them to statt looking back even further in the fossil record to try to find a common ancestor or missing link branch from the primates.They won't find it.
Then there is Cro-magnon "anatomically modern human" found in Australia and has revealed that it was atleast 60,000 years old and had a mitochondrial DNA gentic marker that is now extinct.So that nobody is descended from that particular line of beings,atleast on the female side.
Although there have been found in the DNA of some of the earth's modern human populstion,this does not prove conclusively that Neanderthal and modern man mated sometime in the past.There is another plausible biblical explanation and how in the bible angels always appeared to man as men and we know fallen angels produced hybrid giant off-spring - Giants - in Genesis 6. So there is biblical reasons to know that the powers of darkness understand something about genetics in order to be able to produce these hybrids. There are other biblical examples that back this up too,but I digress. And so angels were probably up to their same evil deeds in the former world too.
Evolutionary mainline science still cannot provide a fully satisfactory answer to the origins of modern man.
