Literal Genesis.

Discussions on creation beliefs within Christianity, and topics related to creation.
ochotseat
Senior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 5:16 am

Post by ochotseat »

Check this out, Debbie:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/ar ... enesis.asp

Meaning of yôm

When Moses, under the inspiration of God, compiled the account of creation in Genesis 1, he used the Hebrew word yôm for 'day'. He combined yôm with numbers ('first day', 'second day', 'third day', etc.) and with the words 'evening and morning', and the first time he employed it he carefully defined the meaning of yôm (used in this way) as being one night/day cycle (Genesis 1:5). Thereafter, throughout the Bible, yôm used in this way always refers to a normal 24—hour day.2,3 There is thus a prima facie case that, when God used the word yôm in this way, He intended to convey that the days of creation were 24 hours long.

Conclusion

If we are prepared to let the words of the language speak to us in accord with the context and normal definitions, without being influenced by outside ideas, then the word for 'day' in Genesis 1—which is qualified by a number, the phrase 'evening and morning,' and for day one the words 'light and darkness'—obviously means an ordinary day (about 24 hours).
Deborah wrote:We also need to understand that YOM (Hewbrew) does not only translate to day.

Here is a wordstudy on the word YOM
Word Study — Yom

By Greg Neyman

© 2005, Answers In Creation

Published 16 March 2005



The Hebrew word for “day” is the word “Yom.” Young earth creationists have always argued that the word used for the days of creation can only mean a 24-hour day. In this article, we will examine the uses of Yom in the Old Testament, and show that it can mean a wide variety of time periods.

First, one must understand that the Hebrew language is not nearly is diverse as our English language. Whereas we have millions of words, the Hebrew source for the Old Testament only consists of slightly less than 8,700 words...and many of these could be considered duplicates with only slight differences. Thus, words which contain multiple meanings are common. Such is the case with the word Yom.



Hebrew Dictionaries



Let's start with the possible meanings of Yom;



The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (1980, Moody Press)

"It can denote: 1. the period of light (as contrasted with the period of darkness), 2. the period of twenty-four hours, 3. a general vague "time," 4. a point of time, 5. a year (in the plural; I Sam 27:7; Ex 13:10, etc.)."

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (symbols omitted)

from an unused root meaning to be hot; a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figuratively (a space of time defined by an associated term), [often used adv.]:--age, + always, + chronicles, continually (-ance), daily, ([birth-], each, to) day, (now a, two) days (agone), + elder, end, evening, (for)ever(lasting), ever(more), full, life, as long as (...live), even now, old, outlived, perpetually, presently, remaineth, required, season, since, space, then, (process of) time, as at other times, in trouble, weather (as) when, (a, the, within a) while (that), whole (age), (full) year (-ly), younger

As you can see, Hebrew dictionaries attest to the fact that the word Yom is used for anywhere from 12 hours up to a year, and even a vague "time period" of unspecified length.


Other Uses of Yom



Day is not the only translation for the word Yom. Here are some other uses.



Time



It is interesting to note that in 67 verses in the Old Testament, the word Yom is translated into the English word "time." For instance, in Genesis 4:3, it says "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord." In this instance, Yom refers to a growing season, probably several months. Again, in Deuteronomy 10:10, it refers to a "time" equal to forty days. In I Kings 11:42, it says "And the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years." In this case, Yom translated as the word "time" is equivalent to a 40 year period.

In Isaiah 30:8, it says "Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever." In this case, Yom is equal to "forever." How long is forever? An infinite number of years...billions upon billions upon billons of years. If Yom can equal trillions of years here, then why not billions of years in Genesis?



Year



Four times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "year." In I Kings 1:1, "David was old and stricken in years..." In 2 Chronicles 21:19, "after the end of two years" and in the very next verse "Thirty and two years old." Finally, in Amos 4:4, "...and your tithes after three years." In each case, Yom represents years, not days.



Age



Eight times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "age." These range from sentences like "stricken in age," meaning old age (Genesis 18:11 and 24:1; Joshua 23:1 and 23:2), and other times it says "old age" (Genesis 21:2, Genesis 21:7). Genesis 47:28 refers to "the whole age of Jacob," therefore yom here refers to an entire lifetime. In Zechariah 8:4, it says old men and women will sit in the streets of Jerusalem, "each with cane in hand because of his age."



Ago



One time Yom is translated "ago." 1 Samuel 9:20 says "As for the donkeys you lost three days ago, ..."



Always



Four times yom is translated as "always," in Deuteronomy 5:29, 6:24, 14:23, and in 2 Chronicles 18:7. Always here can be interpreted as a lifetime...for instance, we are to keep the commandments of the Lord always (Deut. 5:29).



Season



Three times yom is translated "season." In Genesis 40:4, "...and they continued a season in ward." Again, in Joshua 24:7, "dwelt in the wilderness a long season," and in 2 Chronicles 15:3, "...a long season Israel hath been...". In each case yom represents a multi-month period.



Chronicles



When used in conjunction with the word dâbâr, yom is translated "chronicles" (27 times).



Continually



When used in conjunction with kôwl, yom is translated as "continually" (11 times). Once, in Psalm 139:16, it is translated continuance (without the kôwl).



Ever



Ever is used to represent a long period of time, such as in Deuteronomy 19:9, "to walk ever in his ways." Nineteen times Yom is translated "ever." The old testament uses "for ever" instead of the word forever. In sixteen cases of use of the word ever, for is placed before it, indicating a infinite period of time. I will not list them all (consult Strong's Concordance for a full listing) but here is an example. In Psalm 23:6, it says "Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life; and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever." Here Yom is translated as the final word of this verse, ever. Thus, Yom in this verse, and 16 others, represents eternity.



Evermore



In one instance, when yom is used in conjunction with kôwl, Yom is translated "evermore." Deuteronomy 28:29, "...and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore;" thus representing either a lifetime or eternity.



Word Usage in the Old Testament



As you can see, Yom is used in a wide variety of situations related to the concept of time. Yom is not just for days...it is for time in general. How it is translated depends on the context of its use with other words.

Yom in the Creation Account

Even within the creation account, Yom is used to represent four different time periods.

Genesis 1:5 "And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night." Here, Moses uses Yom to indicate a 12-hour period
Genesis 1:14 "And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years." Here, Moses uses Yom to indicate 24-hour days
Genesis 2:4 "...in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens." Here, Moses uses Yom to indicate the entire creative week.
The fourth usage of Yom in the creation account is in the summary for each of the six creation days, "and there was morning and evening the first day". Yom is used to represent a finite, long period of time, usually either millions or billions of years. To show support for this, consider the uses of Yom by Moses.

Moses Other Uses of Yom

Moses, the author of the first five books of the Bible, and of Psalm 90, used Yom in many different ways.

Genesis 4:3 "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord." In this instance, Yom refers to a growing season, probably several months.
Genesis 43:9 "...then let me bear the blame for ever." Here, Moses uses Yom to represent eternity
Genesis 44:32 "...then I shall bear the blame to my father for ever." Again, Moses uses Yom to represent eternity
Deuteronomy 4:40 "...that thou mayest prolong thy days upon the earth, which the Lord thy God giveth the, for ever." Here Yom represents a physical lifetime
Deuteronomy 10:10, "Now I stayed on the mountain forty days and nights, as I did the first time,..." Here, Yom is a "time" equal to forty days.
Deuteronomy 18:5 "...to stand to minister in the name of the Lord, him and his sons for ever." Again, Yom is translated as eternity
Deuteronomy 19:9 "...to love the Lord thy God, and to walk ever in His ways..." Here, Yom represents a lifetime. As long as we live we are to walk in his ways


As you can see, Moses used the word Yom to represent 12-hours, 24 hours, the creative week, forty days, several months, a lifetime, and eternity.



Common Young Earth Arguments



To get around the obvious conclusion that Yom in Genesis 1 can mean millions of years, young earth theorists have come up with several arguments, none of which is supported by common Hebrew grammatical rules according to Hebrew experts (such as Dr. Walter Kaiser). These rules were created by Hebrew language experts who are young earth creationists to begin with, thus their viewpoint is obviously biased. They have a specific agenda they are trying to prove, and thus cannot be objective.



Ordinals/Cardinals



Young earth creationists say that whenever Yom is used with an ordinal or cardinal number (1st, 2nd, 1,2, etc) that it always represents a 24 hour day. However, this is not true. In Zechariah 14:7-9, the "one day" refers to a period of time when the Lord shall be king over the earth. In other places, some say that Isaiah and Hosea have numbers with the word day which are figurative (External Link).

Some young earth theorists, including Jonathan Sarfati in his book Refuting Compromise, have addressed this verse in Zechariah an Hosea. Although his argument sounds impressive, you have to recognize it for what it is...he is arguing for his young earth agenda, thus any rules that he espouses must be examined by true Hebrew scholars who are impartial. Hebrew scholars do not recognize this fabricated rule.1

What Sarfati thinks is not important...what is important, as Dr. Walter Kaiser points out, is the intentions of the author. We should not create rules that support our own agendas, but should strive to understand the author's intended meaning outside of rules.



Evening/Morning Construction



In Genesis 1 Moses says "and there was evening and morning the xx day". Does the use of evening and morning indicate a sunrise and sunset for each creative day? First, let's look at what evening and morning are not. They are not actual evening and mornings, as this requires a sunrise and sunset. According to young earth theory, the Sun was not created until Day Four, thus there could be no sunrise or sunset for the first three days of creation. However, God uses the terms evening and morning for those first three days. Therefore, they cannot be actual evenings and mornings.

We are left with only one option. The words for Evening and Morning can only represent the beginning and ending of the creative period, and not actual sunrise and sunsets. Scripture itself sets this pattern for us. Morning and evening are used figuratively in Psalm 30:5, Psalm 49:14,15, Psalm 90:6. Thus, the evening and morning of creation can mean the start and end of the creative process that is attributed to that creation period.

Young earth advocates counter that traditionally, church fathers have always held that sunrise and sunsets do not constitute a day, and they accepted the sun creation on Day Four with no hint of the first three days being anything other than 24-hour days. For instance, Sarfati in Refuting Compromise mentions Luther and Calvin (page 84-86). However, Luther and Calvin did not have the means of modern science at their disposal. At the time, geocentricity was still accepted! Don't fall into the trap of following the teachings of our church fathers. For more, read Church Fathers.



Literal/Figurative Argument



This argument says that you cannot use a word figuratively until after you have used it literally (see this Answers in Genesis article). The author gives two examples, which appear to be correct and follow this rule. However, is this rule valid? I see no reason to suppose that it is. You have to be careful with young earth claims about biblical interpretation methods. Again, they will invent rules that support their cause, when there is no basis for their rule in Hebrew.

In this case, it makes no difference which order the word Yom appears in, i.e. literal before figurative or vice versa. Yes, these are the first words of the Bible, but they are not the first words of mankind. All the time from Adam to Moses, men were speaking in their own languages, thus the literal interpretation via spoken language would already have been established. There was no need to suppose a literal/figurative structure.



If God's Creation Was Billions of Years Old...



If God's creation was billions of years old, how would He have written the creation account in Genesis? One thing is certain...God is good at telling us exactly what we need to know.

When God refers to a large number, He uses picture stories, such as Abraham's descendants being as numerous as the sand. Why does He do this? If God had said, "You will have millions of descendants," Abraham would have asked, "What is a million?"

When considering the creation, if we broke it down into days, that would be 5,000,500,000,000 days, or roughly 13.7 billion years. Do we need an account for each day of creation...of course not. God in His infinite wisdom, saw fit to tell us the creation story by breaking it down into creative segments, each of which was attributed to a specific creative act or acts. We need to give the early Hebrews of Genesis a break...they didn't have calculators like we do!

One must also consider that time with God has no meaning. To Him, 10 billion years is like a day. Thus, it is no problem for God to put billions of years into one of His days. Dr. Hugh Ross puts it best in his determination that the frame of reference for creation is the surface of the earth. Genesis 1:2 puts the witness of creation on the surface. But who is witnessing these events? It is God himself. During the first 5.99 days of creation, God is the only one present. Thus, human time does not matter...no humans were there to witness the passage of time. What matters is how God sees time! Thus, a billion year day is only a passing moment in God's eyes.

The creation account is written in such a manner for all people to understand it. The issue is not how long creation took...the issue is that God did it, and that's all that matters in the end.



Conclusion



With such a wide usage of the word Yom for many different time periods, it cannot be claimed that Yom in the Old Testament only represents a 24-hour period. During the creation account alone, Yom represents four different time periods. Rules of Hebrew, created by young earth Hebrew scholars, are invalid. Because of their biased position, they are trying to prove their own agenda.

Since humans did not witness creation, our own concept of a 24-hour day does not apply. The only thing that matters is God's concept of time. Thus, the only evidence we have to accurately assess the age of creation is the creation itself. Since the rocks and stars say we are billions of years old, that must be the truth. This fits perfectly with a literal interpretation of Genesis, and an inerrant Bible, and does not impact any other Biblical doctrines.



1 Television Show and Transcript, "Are the Genesis Creation Days 24 Hours or Long Periods of Time," The John Ankerberg Show, 2005.
http://www.answersincreation.org/word_study_yom.htm
User avatar
Deborah
Senior Member
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Christian: No
Location: Australia

Post by Deborah »

Check this out, Debbie:
*SIGH* IT'S Deborah please
Church tradition tells us that when John, son of Zebadee and brother of James was an old man, his disciples would carry him to church in their arms.
He would simply say, “Little children, love one another”
After a time his disciples wearied at always hearing these same words and asked “Master why do you always say this?
He replied, “it is the Lords command, and if done, it is enough”
User avatar
Mastermind
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1410
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:22 pm

Re: Literal Genesis.

Post by Mastermind »

Kurieuo wrote:
Mastermind wrote:I'd like to say I no longer adhere to a literal Genesis position.
Well that came as a *shock* ;) Yet, literal isn't always necessarily correct anyway. For example, was the snake in Genesis a literal serpent, or actually symbolic for Satan as Revelation 12:9 implies? Was the tree of life that was removed from the Garden an actual tree with fruit, or is this also symbolic for Christ who gives everlasting life? Or perhaps something more agreeable as symbolic by all Christians with Jesus' words that we must all eat Him to live forever (than again Catholics think they eat Him within the eucharist don't they?). Yet, this is where the role of theology and hermeneutics come in for it is more important to understand what is actually being said rather than literally said. Many people confuse literal for actual, but it seems obvious to me this is not always the case.
No argument here. I'd like to say one thing about the snake though:

Gen 3:14 The LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life.

Why did God curse the entire race of snakes? If the snake is the devil that is. Curiously enough, evolution states that the snake's ancestor used to have legs rather than crawl around on the ground. In fact, I think that modern day snakes still have remnants of those legs.
I don't believe it is argued that 'bara' always mean creation ex nihilo, although I'm sure some Day-Agers may have argued this. However, the subject of bara is said to be exclusively God, and bara also does possess connotations of something new being made. Luis Stadelmann in The Hebrew Conception of the World (as quoted within Holding's An Examination of Creation Ex Nihilo):
By analyzing God's efficient causality as well as his active control manifested in the world-order as a whole and in each of its aspects and details we find that (bara) expresses, together with its basic meaning of creating, the idea either of novelty or of an extraordinary result. Moreover, since (bara) is the term par excellence for God's creative activity, it is only natural that it also implies the idea of his effortless production by means of his powerful word without any help of outside intervention.
Umm, that applies to pretty much all creation. One could argue that the first animals were also something new. So were the first plants. So were the first stars.
I can see a difference between the two here. In verse 26 God is speaking about what He is about to make. In verse 27 the action is being carried out. The Genesis 1 creation seems to follow this literary form, that is, God says/God made.
I can see a difference too. What I don't see is why it matters. In both instances they are referring to the exact same event.
I'm not sure I understand any other problems you believe exist, especially assuming you are totally clear as to how Day-Age advocates usually explain the light passages. I've detailed this out before, and Rich's own response can also be read at http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/genesis1.html.

Kurieuo.
Of course I am and Rich's interpretation makes sense. However, Rich doesn't explain why "let there be" is odd. I don't think that Rich went into it in depth. While I accept his interpretation as valid, I can't accept it as LITERAL for the reasons stated in my OP.
Are you threatening me Master Skeptic?
User avatar
Mastermind
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1410
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:22 pm

Post by Mastermind »

ochotseat wrote: Meaning of yôm

When Moses, under the inspiration of God, compiled the account of creation in Genesis 1, he used the Hebrew word yôm for 'day'. He combined yôm with numbers ('first day', 'second day', 'third day', etc.) and with the words 'evening and morning', and the first time he employed it he carefully defined the meaning of yôm (used in this way) as being one night/day cycle (Genesis 1:5). Thereafter, throughout the Bible, yôm used in this way always refers to a normal 24—hour day.2,3 There is thus a prima facie case that, when God used the word yôm in this way, He intended to convey that the days of creation were 24 hours long.

This crud has been refuted over and over and over. May I suggest you stop cutting and pasting uncritically from AiG and actually read your opponent's arguments?
Are you threatening me Master Skeptic?
User avatar
Mastermind
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1410
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 3:22 pm

Post by Mastermind »

AttentionKMartShoppers wrote:AAaaawwww, mastermind, what's wrong? Do you need a HUG?
I'd rather drink boiling mercury.
Are you threatening me Master Skeptic?
waynes world
Established Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:20 pm
Christian: No
Location: portland oregon

Post by waynes world »

Mastermind wrote:
ochotseat wrote: Meaning of yôm

When Moses, under the inspiration of God, compiled the account of creation in Genesis 1, he used the Hebrew word yôm for 'day'. He combined yôm with numbers ('first day', 'second day', 'third day', etc.) and with the words 'evening and morning', and the first time he employed it he carefully defined the meaning of yôm (used in this way) as being one night/day cycle (Genesis 1:5). Thereafter, throughout the Bible, yôm used in this way always refers to a normal 24—hour day.2,3 There is thus a prima facie case that, when God used the word yôm in this way, He intended to convey that the days of creation were 24 hours long.

This crud has been refuted over and over and over. May I suggest you stop cutting and pasting uncritically from AiG and actually read your opponent's arguments?
The young earthers seem to make the same old arguments it seems to me. I don't see 24 hours anywhere in the Hebrew for day! What I notice is a 12 hour period from Sunset to Sunrise, not vice versa. The word yom in Zecharian 14 verses 7-9 is not hardly 24 hours and yet its the same hebrew word as Genesis 1:5. Is God greater than time or is time lord over God? Thats the question here. Is God capable of using a long time if he wanted to? There could have been a long time in Genesis 1:1 and verse 2. The days could have started with verse 3 where the words "and God said" appear.
waynes world
Established Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:20 pm
Christian: No
Location: portland oregon

Post by waynes world »

http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/sixdays.html

If you look at this site it refutes the claim that yom always means 24 hours
ochotseat
Senior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 5:16 am

Post by ochotseat »

Mastermind wrote: This crud has been refuted over and over and over. May I suggest you stop cutting and pasting uncritically from AiG and actually read your opponent's arguments?
Refuted by you? :lol: There are many theologians who believe in the literal Genesis account and vice versa. The only logical answer is God only knows. Since you don't believe in Genesis, why do you prefer creationism over evolution? After all, the theory of evolution is support by almost all scientists.
User avatar
Kurieuo
Honored Member
Posts: 10038
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:25 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Progressive Creationist
Location: Qld, Australia

Post by Kurieuo »

And I'm one that advocates a literal interpretation of Genesis. I believe the crux of the issue between our positions comes down to, if any of our literal interpretations should be followed, which one should it be?

Kurieuo.
"Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved." (Romans 10:13)
waynes world
Established Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:20 pm
Christian: No
Location: portland oregon

Post by waynes world »

Since when does God require believers to accept the literal 24 hour young earth view of Genesis? Thats man made not God made!
User avatar
Believer
Advanced Senior Member
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:44 pm
Christian: No
Location: Oregon

Post by Believer »

waynes world wrote:Since when does God require believers to accept the literal 24 hour young earth view of Genesis? Thats man made not God made!
True, in the Bible, it just says days, not 12 hour days, not 24 hour days, and certainly not the third one which is an infinite number of days. Just days. Remember, in the Bible, it states that Gods time is MUCH different than ours, and since we were created after creation (which could also mean evolution :wink:), we then came to realize our own time. The Bible clearly speaks of God making all things in OUR time, not His, multiple times.
waynes world
Established Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:20 pm
Christian: No
Location: portland oregon

Post by waynes world »

I have seen the original Hebrew for Genesis 1 and noticed that the word "day" only appears twice. The phrase evening and morning appear separately not together. If God's time is different than ours how can anyone insist on only one interpretation when at least 3 are possible in Strongs anyway including 12 hours 24, or symbolic.
ochotseat
Senior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 5:16 am

Post by ochotseat »

waynes world wrote:Since when does God require believers to accept the literal 24 hour young earth view of Genesis? Thats man made not God made!
It doesn't, but most Americans literally accept Genesis, so you shouldn't mock their beliefs.
User avatar
Kurieuo
Honored Member
Posts: 10038
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:25 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Progressive Creationist
Location: Qld, Australia

Post by Kurieuo »

And I one on those literal positions accepted, is the unspecified period of time literally inherent in the word yom. Wayne, you might be interested to read over the thread also at http://discussions.godandscience.org/vi ... sc&start=0.

Kurieuo.
"Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved." (Romans 10:13)
waynes world
Established Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:20 pm
Christian: No
Location: portland oregon

Post by waynes world »

Its really a shame the way people with the ICR are going after those who don't agree with the YEC 24 hour view. One church I was at had me in a vicious debate with a lady who told me I was on "shakey ground" because I couldn't accept the notion that the dinasours climbed aboard the ark! It got so ugly at that church that I had to leave. what I don't understand is why churches only have membes of the ICR on without allowing any opposition at all. Theycome across as if there's no other way to heaven except throughbelieving the young earth view. I wish people would realize that its not a salvation issue. We all will stand befor God someday and I don't think He will ask us what view of Genesis 1 we believed in. Who are we to put a time limit on God?
Post Reply