"Mueller" determined? He didn't even seem to know what was in "his" report.edwardmurphy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 1:55 pmLast I looked impeachment had majority support and Trump's defense has shifted from nothing happened to no quid pro quo to fine, there was a quid pro quo - get over it.RickD wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:32 amI think they realize that they can't beat Trump in an election, so they will use any means they can, to get him out of office.
It's really quite pathetic, actually.
Regarding "Russiagate" I'm not sure why you guys are sticking to that ridiculous lie. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the extent to which Russia interfered with the 2016 election and whether or not Russia and Trump were involved in a criminal conspiracy. Mueller determined that Russia did interfere and that Trump obstructed justice on 10 different occasions while attempting to block said investigation. The narrative that it was to investigate "collusion" came from Donald "NO COLLUSION" Trump. The investigation didn't look at collusion. That said, collusion is well established. We watched it happen in real time.
And now, Tulsi Gabbard is what, a Russian asset too? Hillary who helped push "Russiagate" is just bonkers and I even saw CNN calling her out over the latest. Though corporate media is generally right up Hillary's you know what.
Check out what Jimmy Dore has to say on his show, points out many things, and he's definitely by no means a fan of Trump or like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6juT2B5xtc (profanity warning)