The following is what I am 100% convinced of about God.RickD wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:28 pmAgain Kenny,Kenny wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:58 pmKenny wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:44 amThis does not apply to me because I believe something IS known of the existence of God. Even though I don’t believe in what people call God, would you still call me Agnostic?Agnostic-
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena;If to claim “disbelief” means to claim to not believe, then #2 does not apply to me either because I do claim to not believe.RickD wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:50 amIf the second part, the underlined part, applies to you, then yes I would call you an agnostic.
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.When you speak of God, I am going to assume you are referring to the God of the Bible only.
If you tell me you have a friend who is capable of preforming acts outside the laws of nature, does the impossible; but I can’t see, hear, or experience him in any way using my 5 senses because he is not of this world, I will be convinced that you are either lying or misguided and that your friend does not exist.
You said that you believe something IS known of the existence of God.
And I asked you what do you believe is known of the existence of God.
Your answer didn't address your statement, nor my question regarding your statement.
So again, what do you believe is known of the existence of God?
I believe God means different things to different people.
I believe some versions of God do exist, but most don’t.
I believe all the claims people make of God are false.
Not sure if this answers your question; if not give an example of what you are talking about.