Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

Discussion about scientific issues as they relate to God and Christianity including archaeology, origins of life, the universe, intelligent design, evolution, etc.
abelcainsbrother
Ultimate Member
Posts: 4771
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Gap Theory
Has liked: 203 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

#241

Post by abelcainsbrother » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:00 am

All the Skeptics of the shroud are doing is ignoring the facts about the shroud causing confusion about the evidence for the Shroud.But what you need to understand is that instead of causing confusion about the real evidence behind the shroud the skeptics need to prove the shroud is a fake/forgery because the Skeptics claim this but have never been able to prove this by showing how the image on the shroud and the over 400 blood stains from the crucifixion got there on the burial linen of the shroud.

Plus,get this, they know these over 400 blood stains were on the burial linen BEFORE the image was even produced.This is VERY important to know and realize.So the Skeptics MUST put these over 400 scourge blood stains on the burial linen FIRST,,they are all over the back,chest and legs on both sides of the shroud image,then produce an image WITHOUT covering over these blood stains and they CANNOT do it.

They need to focus on proving the shroud is a forgery and the only way to do this is to create another shroud image like the real shroud which they cannot do.It is those who claim the shroud is a fake/forgery that have no evidence to claim this,but yet still claim it.

If you do a google search on the shroud you'd come to the conclusion the shroud is a fake/forgery but there is no evidence to prove this because no skeptic can replicate the image on the shroud plus the real blood stains to prove it is a fake/forgery and many skeptics have tried to replicate it but have failed. In the failed attempts to replicate the shroud image with real blood stains on it they allways ignore the over 400 blood stains on the real shroud to where the failed attempts have no blood stains on them and just an image that is not like the original image on the shroud.

They always ignore the real blood stains on the real shroud because they would just cover over all of them when they produce their image that again is still not like the original shroud image and has NO over 400 blood stains on it from the scourge wounds and the nails in the hands and ankles,,plus the crown of thorns,plus the spear wound in the side. Yet they claim it is like the real shroud image when they ignored the over 400 scourge blood stains on the real shroud all over the chest,back and legs on both sides of the image.None of the failed attempts to try to show how the shroud image was put their have these blood over 400 blood stains from a Roman scourging on them,not even one.They totally ignore these blood stains that are visible on the real shroud.Also,it does not matter if they claim they are not real blood stains at all.Because they are still visible on the real shroud and so cannot be ignored at all.They still MUST produce an image with these scourge wounds visible.They can use something other than blood and it will not matter.They can use paint,etc and will still not be seen because they'll cover over all of them when producing an image.

They never have these blood stains on them that can be easily seen on the real burial linen of the shroud when a certian kind of light is shown on the real shroud image.And so they cannot prove the shroud is a fake/forgery but yet they still claim it and most people ignorant of the shroud believe the skeptics who have no evidence to prove it is a fake/forgery.It can only be proven it is a fsake/forgery by truly showing how the shroud image plus blood stains got there and they never have and can't do it,so that they have no evidence to claim it is a fake/forgery.The evidence is not on the skeptics side and their lies and confusion.

Now evidence is what we use to tell a truth from a lie and the skeptics MUST stop claiming the shroud is a fake/forgery until they can prove it by showing how this could have been made by man at ANY time in history.
Hebrews 12:2-3 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith;who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross,despising the shame,and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

2nd Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not,lest the light of this glorious gospel of Christ,who is the image of God,should shine unto them.

bippy123
Prestigious Senior Member
Posts: 1895
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:56 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

#242

Post by bippy123 » Wed Oct 10, 2018 9:33 pm

abelcainsbrother wrote:
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:00 am
All the Skeptics of the shroud are doing is ignoring the facts about the shroud causing confusion about the evidence for the Shroud.But what you need to understand is that instead of causing confusion about the real evidence behind the shroud the skeptics need to prove the shroud is a fake/forgery because the Skeptics claim this but have never been able to prove this by showing how the image on the shroud and the over 400 blood stains from the crucifixion got there on the burial linen of the shroud.

Plus,get this, they know these over 400 blood stains were on the burial linen BEFORE the image was even produced.This is VERY important to know and realize.So the Skeptics MUST put these over 400 scourge blood stains on the burial linen FIRST,,they are all over the back,chest and legs on both sides of the shroud image,then produce an image WITHOUT covering over these blood stains and they CANNOT do it.

They need to focus on proving the shroud is a forgery and the only way to do this is to create another shroud image like the real shroud which they cannot do.It is those who claim the shroud is a fake/forgery that have no evidence to claim this,but yet still claim it.

If you do a google search on the shroud you'd come to the conclusion the shroud is a fake/forgery but there is no evidence to prove this because no skeptic can replicate the image on the shroud plus the real blood stains to prove it is a fake/forgery and many skeptics have tried to replicate it but have failed. In the failed attempts to replicate the shroud image with real blood stains on it they allways ignore the over 400 blood stains on the real shroud to where the failed attempts have no blood stains on them and just an image that is not like the original image on the shroud.

They always ignore the real blood stains on the real shroud because they would just cover over all of them when they produce their image that again is still not like the original shroud image and has NO over 400 blood stains on it from the scourge wounds and the nails in the hands and ankles,,plus the crown of thorns,plus the spear wound in the side. Yet they claim it is like the real shroud image when they ignored the over 400 scourge blood stains on the real shroud all over the chest,back and legs on both sides of the image.None of the failed attempts to try to show how the shroud image was put their have these blood over 400 blood stains from a Roman scourging on them,not even one.They totally ignore these blood stains that are visible on the real shroud.Also,it does not matter if they claim they are not real blood stains at all.Because they are still visible on the real shroud and so cannot be ignored at all.They still MUST produce an image with these scourge wounds visible.They can use something other than blood and it will not matter.They can use paint,etc and will still not be seen because they'll cover over all of them when producing an image.

They never have these blood stains on them that can be easily seen on the real burial linen of the shroud when a certian kind of light is shown on the real shroud image.And so they cannot prove the shroud is a fake/forgery but yet they still claim it and most people ignorant of the shroud believe the skeptics who have no evidence to prove it is a fake/forgery.It can only be proven it is a fsake/forgery by truly showing how the shroud image plus blood stains got there and they never have and can't do it,so that they have no evidence to claim it is a fake/forgery.The evidence is not on the skeptics side and their lies and confusion.

Now evidence is what we use to tell a truth from a lie and the skeptics MUST stop claiming the shroud is a fake/forgery until they can prove it by showing how this could have been made by man at ANY time in history.
Great points Abel . Just looking at all of these key evidences should make any open minded person look intuitively at the shroud and think how could anyone back them create this image with all of the difficulties involved that science today can’t create.

It’s amazing that the sceptics aren’t honest enough to 1% doubt their own scepticism .

If I was a sceptic if the shroud I’d be scratching my head in complete bewilderment .

As cambridge art historian (whose an agnostic ) said the shroud image doesn’t conform to any artwork from any period of history .

User avatar
DRDS
Senior Member
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:55 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

#243

Post by DRDS » Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:11 pm

Hey everyone long long time no see, I thought I would stop by and leave this here. Bippy123 told me to do so and it's Bippy's world and I'm just living in it! :P See you later guys GB.

http://m.ncregister.com/daily-news/the- ... dzyOXKuqaA
These users liked this post by DRDS:
PaulSacramento (Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:42 am)

PaulSacramento
Board Moderator
Posts: 8977
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ontario, Canada
Has liked: 117 times
Been liked: 335 times

Re: Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

#244

Post by PaulSacramento » Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:43 am

At least all the suspicions about those tests have been proven to be, not only justified, but correct.

Philip
Board Moderator
Posts: 8063
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:45 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age
Location: Betwixt the Sea and the Mountains
Has liked: 367 times
Been liked: 602 times

Re: Shroud of Turin - Summary of Evidence for its Authenticity

#245

Post by Philip » Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:36 pm

The press was no doubt complicit that the 1988 supposed medieval date asserted of the Shroud was an unquestionable scientific fact. Why weren't more questions asked to bring clarity to the accusations of a fraudulent test - as anyone who raised doubts was eagerly dismissed as a conspiracy theorist or a Christian nutjob.

So, it took 30 years and a freedom of information request to exam the supposedly rigorous 1988 scientitic testing if the Shroud. And thus the article quote: “Usually when something is revealed only under duress it is because there is something to hide. Is that the case here?”

And we now learn that the testers not only violated scientific protocol, and tested the absolute worst place on the Shroud (a repaired edge). And while “the entire process was caught on film, when it came time to cut up the sample into sections and deposit them into stainless steel vials, they went into a room outside the view of the camera. This fact is not helpful - did they not know the whole world would be watching?” Now, why would they ever do THAT??? y:-?

And it is especially strange that the ‘88 researchers would have only tested the edge, as it had "been long held by some scholars that those sample areas had been affected by exposure to fire in 1532 while the shroud was stored in the Sainte-Chapelle, in Chambéry, France.”

Post Reply