Kenny wrote:PaulSacramento wrote:Kenny wrote:PaulSacramento wrote:Kenny wrote:
No, the wall is you confusing my disagreements, with me not knowing the difference between THAT something IS (Ontology) vs WHAT something is (Epistemology)
So, 1+1 = 2 even if there was no one around to count or anything to count?
Really? because on the last thread we had this discussion you disagreed.
Something about math ( like forms and such) only existing because they were invented by man.
The system of Arithmetic works whether someone is around to use it or not. But if mankind never existed, the system would not have been invented.
So, if mankind never existed, 1+1 would not =2?