Questioning Dawkins

[Kurieuo]

Think this is appropriate to this forum area.

[Ivellious]

I have to say this is rather unimpressive due to the harsh jump-cuts in the film, the really unprofessional added sound effects, and the fact that it unbelievably cuts off the answer to the last question, since obviously the exchange does not end there. Why cut it off there? To make Dawkins look dumb, not to fairly show his answer to the question.

[Danieltwotwenty]

I agree with Ivel, is there a link to the whole debate as this was just silly?

[Kurieuo]

Umm... you guys do realise it was joke and purposefully chopped and changed? I thought it'd be obvious to all it was a joke. It's meant to be amusing.

Given what Dawkins (and his friends like Krauss) really do dish out... if a little bit of a joke can't be handled, then that's just sad.

The full debate can be found here:


But I'd much rather divert your attention to this one:


I'm sure you both will love that one with Craig with "Dawkins" just as much.

[Danieltwotwenty]

Well I do admit I did laugh when I watched it, but I was still not sure if it was serious or not. When I watch debates I usually go for the full thing, so I have not seen any atheist videos taking the Mickey, that's probably why I didn't get it.