Page 1 of 1

'People are Basically Good' 2 broken links

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 9:01 am
by Hortator
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetic ... egood.html

References number 2 and 5 lead to "404" error pages.

The broken links:

http://paws.wcu.edu/jwhitmire/documents/Obedience.pdf

http://www.radford.edu/~jaspelme/gradso ... ulture.pdf

"That's really all I gawt to say about that."

Also, should there be an official "broken links" topic? Because I have found broken links in other articles before, namely the great, big "Why Natural Evil Must Exist" essay

Re: 'People are Basically Good' 2 broken links

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:36 pm
by Kurieuo
You should contact Rich: http://www.godandscience.org/formmail1.html

The website was more out of his personal interest I believe. G&S isn't some organisation. And, he's been through a bit the last few years. I'm not really sure what his intentions are. Except we have the board here running, kind of separate from but also linked to/from the main site.

But, do notify him though via that form.

Re: 'People are Basically Good' 2 broken links

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 6:27 pm
by MBPrata
Broken links are relatively common on this website, and that's one of the reasons atheists websites claim G&S of being outdated...which doesn't help convincing people with doubt or indecisions. :(

Just another example: http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_de ... singleton/

Re: 'People are Basically Good' 2 broken links

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:45 pm
by B. W.
The problem also is the result of other websites discontinuation of links this site has linked too.

Feel free to find as many as you can and let us know...
-
-
-

Re: 'People are Basically Good' 2 broken links

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:31 am
by Hortator
B. W. wrote:The problem also is the result of other websites discontinuation of links this site has linked too.

Feel free to find as many as you can and let us know...
-
-
-


That just seems wrong to me on so many levels, that some websites would do that to us....

I like this website, and want to see it shine. I'll look for more broken links when I get home from school.

A year later and I still haven't delivered on that promise xD

I think, if people need to verify Rich Deem's claims, when the data is pretty much readily available out there already with enough hand motions, then they're just trying to discredit what he says because of what he says.