Debunking Dawkins?

Discuss strengths and weaknesses of new pages added to the God And Science website
Beanybag
Valued Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:22 am
Christian: No
Sex: It's Complicated
Creation Position: I don't believe in creation

Re: Debunking Dawkins?

Postby Beanybag » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:37 am

PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.

y#-o

PaulSacramento
Board Moderator
Posts: 7286
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Debunking Dawkins?

Postby PaulSacramento » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:42 am

Beanybag wrote:
PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.

y#-o

Regardless of how you feel, it is a fact.
Sam Harris is not one of my favorite atheist writers ( unlike Hitchens and Dawkins when he sticks to what he knows best like in his book "greatest show on earth") simply because the man is NOT very bright and doesn't seem to grasp the true consequences of what he says.
His ignorance was taken to town by Vox Day in his book and as his "socialist naturalist" leanings are quite evident.


Return to “New Page Critiques”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests