Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Discuss strengths and weaknesses of new pages added to the God And Science website
User avatar
Gman
Old School
Posts: 6081
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 10:36 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age
Location: Northern California

Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby Gman » Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:15 pm

New page.. Comments?

"The existence of a fully land-adapted tetrapod 395 million years ago has completely destroyed the reigning evolutionary paradigm of the fish to land dwelling animal evolutionary hypothesis. Not only did this creature exist before its "transitional" ancestors, but it was already fully adapted to living on land, with feet, toes and claws. Evolutionary biologists are stuck with trying to find the ancestor of this creature, perhaps existing at least 420 million years ago. Their excuse is the classic one - "ghost lineages," according to the authors of the new study. The alternative, but not "scientific" explanation is that God created tetrapods in fully formed ecological communities as part of His preparation of earth for habitation by human beings."

http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/ ... 5TKfhXozwt
The heart cannot rejoice in what the mind rejects as false - Galileo

We learn from history that we do not learn from history - Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think about such things. -Philippians 4:8

Swimmy
Established Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:42 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby Swimmy » Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:24 am

Hm, is there any way to get a actual article. I checked the pages source but the source is barely a paragraph long

User avatar
BavarianWheels
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1492
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:09 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age
Location: Southern California

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby BavarianWheels » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:45 am

.
.
I did a google search on "Tetrapod Tracks" and it returned a bunch of hits...
.
.
Image

User avatar
kmr
Valued Member
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:17 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby kmr » Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:42 pm

Yeah, me too... this really shocked me, because even evolutionary biologists are admitting that this is unusual.
- KMR

Dominum meum amō!

User avatar
UsagiTsukino
Established Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:10 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Female
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby UsagiTsukino » Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:08 pm

I don't think all evolution is a lie. Some parts changes and others don't. You do see certain changes amount species

Audie
Ultimate Member
Posts: 3474
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:41 am
Christian: No
Sex: Female
Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
Location: USA

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby Audie » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:35 pm

Gman wrote:New page.. Comments?

"The existence of a fully land-adapted tetrapod 395 million years ago has completely destroyed the reigning evolutionary paradigm of the fish to land dwelling animal evolutionary hypothesis. Not only did this creature exist before its "transitional" ancestors, but it was already fully adapted to living on land, with feet, toes and claws. Evolutionary biologists are stuck with trying to find the ancestor of this creature, perhaps existing at least 420 million years ago. Their excuse is the classic one - "ghost lineages, according to the authors of the new study. The alternative, but not "scientific" explanation is that God created tetrapods in fully formed ecological communities as part of His preparation of earth for habitation by human beings."

http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/ ... 5TKfhXozwt



Comments" Sure. The words in bold are those one would find in such as a negative political campaign, some hit piece of that sort. I for one dont like someone trying to manipulate me.

This is a science / evidence / God forum, not a "misrepresent science" forum, surely!

"Fully adapted" is not a real term, it has no actual meaning, tho it implies much.

"Stuck with'..? Seriously! New information is a delight to a scientist, not a burden.

The "completely destroys" is silly hype; the thing about "reigning evolutionary paradigm"
is nonsense. Non-sense, something made up by the author.

The"traditional" is well to put as they did, in quotation marks. It too, is nonsense.

Then again the "fully adapted" canard.

"Excuse". Need i even comment.

"The alternative". No. Its not an either / or. Not remotely. There are many alternatives to consider.

I will though agree that the alternative proposed is not scientific, in that it is not supportable with any actual data.

If a person wishes to make a case against ToE, that is good sport and entirely reasonable to try. Science thrives on being tested. But anything other than data really is worthless.

Cant and hyperbole are not the way to do it tho, it only shows the alternative explanation to be feckless.

I think a fair analogy to this kind of discovery disproving ToE would be if someone discovered a WW2 U boat at the bottom of the ocean in some unexpected place.

That would add to the history of it but would certainly not show WW2 never actually happened.

User avatar
abelcainsbrother
Ultimate Member
Posts: 4115
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Gap Theory

Re: Tetrapod Tracks Overturn Reigning Evolutionary Theory

Postby abelcainsbrother » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:40 pm

How much longer can evolutionists teach as a scientific truth dinosaurs evolved over time to be birds when it cannot and has not been demonstrated by any evolutionary scientist that :esurprised: dinosaurs can evolve over time into birds?Their own evidence shows and demonstrates to us that life does not evolve from fruit flies,bacteria,viruses,frogs,salamanders,finches,etc life never evolves according to their own evidence.How long can they continue to sign on to evidence and peer review it and see life evolving when it isn't and get away with it?They love evolution so much and want it to be true so bad that they see life evolving when it isn't evolving at all.They think they are so smart confusing reproduction and life adapting as evidence for life evolving but they are not tricking me.They are going to lose their credibility as scientists in the end for promoting science they cannot prove.
Hebrews 12:2-3 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith;who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross,despising the shame,and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

2nd Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not,lest the light of this glorious gospel of Christ,who is the image of God,should shine unto them.


Return to “New Page Critiques”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest