Ed J wrote:Understanding the Trinity Idea…
There are three (3) main Major Prophets in the Bible. The reason they are called Major Prophets is
because of the long length of the text. The very meanings of their names illustrate a trinity.
1) Isaiah=47: Isaiah’s name means “Jehovah’s Salvation”
(this Prophet illustrates JESUS, because Jesus’ name means “Jehovah’s Savior”)
2) Jeremiah=69: Jeremiah’s name means “Jehovah is High”
(this Prophet illustrates GOD THE FATHER, because He, JEHOVAH=69 is the Highest). (Psalm 83:18)
3) Ezekiel=73: Ezekiel’s name means “EL (GOD) will strengthen”
(this Prophet illustrates the HOLY SPIRIT, because the Holy Spirit strengthens us all in GOD).
Now here is the kicker (47+ 69+73=63 x 3). This mathematical formula
illustrates “YHVH=63” as a Trinity (Meaning 3) using English Gematria.
God bless,
Ed J
That's cute but I wouldn't hang my Trinitarian theological hat on it (especially where Moses is not even mentioned as a major prophet).
jlay wrote:That's cute but I wouldn't hang my Trinitarian theological hat on it (especially where Moses is not even mentioned as a major prophet).
Whaaattt??? Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah and Jerimiah are generally referred to as the major prophets when breaking down the canon. This aint a new thought Byblos.
Byblos wrote:jlay wrote:That's cute but I wouldn't hang my Trinitarian theological hat on it (especially where Moses is not even mentioned as a major prophet).
Whaaattt??? Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah and Jerimiah are generally referred to as the major prophets when breaking down the canon. This aint a new thought Byblos.
I know that J. I was just making a point that Moses didn't even factor in the Trinity link. In fact neither did Daniel who IS a major prophet. So shouldn't we be making a case for quadritarianism then?
Ed J wrote:Byblos wrote:jlay wrote:That's cute but I wouldn't hang my Trinitarian theological hat on it (especially where Moses is not even mentioned as a major prophet).
Whaaattt??? Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah and Jerimiah are generally referred to as the major prophets when breaking down the canon. This aint a new thought Byblos.
I know that J. I was just making a point that Moses didn't even factor in the Trinity link. In fact neither did Daniel who IS a major prophet. So shouldn't we be making a case for quadritarianism then?
Hi Bible (Byblos),
Ed J wrote:The Name Daniel (also a Major Prophet) means "GOD is Judge"; and He (YHVH) is.
This sum (117) seems to be just one in a series of numerical anomalies using English=74 Gematria=74 that helps to illustrate what I call “The God Numbers”=151.
1) 117 GOD The Father=117
2) 74 Jesus=74
3) 151 Holy Spirit=151
4) 63 YHVH=63 (GOD: The Eternal Existing One)
I plan to show these numbers represent “The Key”=74 in understanding (יהוה =26) GOD=26.
God Bless,
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Byblos wrote:Ed J wrote:Byblos wrote:jlay wrote:That's cute but I wouldn't hang my Trinitarian theological hat on it (especially where Moses is not even mentioned as a major prophet).
Whaaattt??? Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah and Jerimiah are generally referred to as the major prophets when breaking down the canon. This aint a new thought Byblos.
I know that J. I was just making a point that Moses didn't even factor in the Trinity link. In fact neither did Daniel who IS a major prophet. So shouldn't we be making a case for quadritarianism then?
Hi Bible (Byblos),
Ha, you googled it, didn't you? Love it, thanks.Ed J wrote:The Name Daniel (also a Major Prophet) means "GOD is Judge"; and He (YHVH) is.
This sum (117) seems to be just one in a series of numerical anomalies using English=74 Gematria=74 that helps to illustrate what I call “The God Numbers”=151.
1) 117 GOD The Father=117
2) 74 Jesus=74
3) 151 Holy Spirit=151
4) 63 YHVH=63 (GOD: The Eternal Existing One)
I plan to show these numbers represent “The Key”=74 in understanding (יהוה =26) GOD=26.
God Bless,
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
I don't doubt what you're saying for a second. The only thing I'm saying is that we shouldn't be offering it as the ultimate proof of the Trinity as detractors will always find number patterns in anything and spin them in an unfavorable way. I know you're not doing that, just sayin'.
God bless you too Ed.
Ed J wrote:
Hi Bible,
The free e-book was available for download on the internet June 21, 2009; I didn’t Google it. When did you start to use the name Bible?
The word “Bible” originates from the Greek word [βιβλος] Bĭb’-lŏs, meaning “Book” (Chapter 18 paragraph 1).
Ed J wrote:Language should always supersede numbers when it comes to tying ideas together. Numbers, however, can and should be used as a second witness though;
using them to help illustrate concepts of GOD more fully. Previously overlooked facts (for example in a criminal case) can lead to much different conclusions.
In a civil case who speaks first plays a larger role than the defense. However in a criminal case, he who speaks first changes NO Facts pertinent to the case.
I believe this is the case with Gematria. Lies and deceptions are perpetuated when evidences that substantiate the truth are ignored, or left un-investigated;
leaving only distractions away from the truth.
Now that we (people as a whole) are starting to understand English Gematria more fully, take another look at the promises God made to Abraham,
even down to calling Abraham THE FATHER OF MANY NATIONS..
God made these three specific promises to Abraham's seed. He said that his seed would be as plenty as the…
1) “Dust of the Earth”=170 (Gen. 13:16)
2) “Stars of Heaven”=153 (Gen. 26:4)
3) “Sand of the Sea”=117 (Gen. 32:12)
It’s interesting to note that the very same language is used in Rev. 20:8 where Satan goes about in battle to deceive the nations,
He is going against God’s people (the people of 117=יהוה האלהים Jehovah God) to deceive, whose number is AS the SAND OF THE SEA=117.
AKJV: Rev. 20:8: “And (Satan) shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog,
to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.”
The Gematria I will use has a direct correlation to the AKJV Bible; cherry picked yes, but harder to debunk, because I did NOT orchestrate its use.
This pattern has occurred over large time scales; diminishing the look of mans manipulation.
God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
jlay wrote:I've seen Chuck Missler give a talk on this. Of course from the original Hebrew. He shows some interesting things that appear to be much more than mere coincidence. But I would handle all of this with EXTREME caution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest