My belief, apparently mistaken, that female orgasm aids the sperm.Audacity wrote:Storyteller wrote:I did say I believe, not I know, I stand corrected about the female orgasm, and being the only creature ti have sex for pleasure.Audacity wrote:Believe what you like, but having looked into just this aspect of the female orgasm, I've found that it has an almost negligible effect. I invite you to Google the subject.Storyteller wrote:Another function for the female orgasm, I believe, is to aid the sperm on their journey, the contractions help apparently.
I think it's as natural as is left-handedness. As for the possibility of the whole human race becoming homosexual and leading to the extinction of our species, this is most likely true. Just as if the everyone started eating one another our population would plummet. However, people aren't eating one another, and the whole human race isn't homosexual. Most studies on homosexuality put its frequency at 1.6% - 3% of the population, leaving no chance the race would go extinct because of its few homosexuals.Audacity... forgive me if this comes across as obtuse but I am genuinely curious, you really think homosexuality is natural? I define it as unnatural, purely because if the human race was homosexual, we'd soon be extinct.
To answer your question about attraction, no you don't "choose" who you fall in love with but that doesn't make it right.
Not right in what context? That it's a sin? That it offends your sensibilities?
What point? That homosexuals who care for, perhaps love one another should get castrated so to prevent them from physically enjoying each other? What purpose would be served?What about paedophiles? I saw a heartbreaking film a while ago, a 22 year old guy who opted for chemical castration because he had sexual feelings for his six year old niece, he told his family, doctor and sought help. He didn't give in to his urges, could the same point not be argued for homosexuals?
You're mistaken. It's been shown that other animals do indeed have sex for pleasure.As for why we women have a clitoris, sure, for pleasure. We, I believe, are the only species to have sex for fun, for pleasure.
Don't know which of your "believes" you feel I took as knowing. Want to point it out?
But you said "could the same point not be argued for homosexuals?" So, it appears to me that the "attraction thing" is indeed aimed at homosexuality.Re the homosexuality... You misunderstand what I'm driving at, what I mean is here was a guy who did everything he could to not act on his urges because they are wrong. I assume we all agree his actions would be wrong.
The arraction thing was aimed more at things like paedophillia, not homosexuality. Homosexuals don't offend me, not much does tbh, bigotry, prejudice and intolerance do but I like to think im none of those things.
Nah. Right here you've judged my reaction to your post as putting down or belittling homosexuals. Everyone judges others, and being a Christian doesn't free them of it. Yourself included.Audacity, my brother is openly gay, I love him. He has been with his boyfriend for over twenty years, I love him too. I defend his right to love whoever he wants but even he views his sexuality as "different" I am NOT putting down or belitting homosexuals, anymore than I would an atheist just because our views differ.
Please dont assume that because I am a Christian I judge anyone. The only person I judge is myself.
I have never said homosexuality is wrong, just unusual.
And I didnt take your response as putting down or belittling homosexuals.
Audacity, I have been judged my whole life, I fought against God, Christ so hard, so long, not daring to believe, I needed proof, I do not have faith in God lightly. For you to tell me I judge hurts. I am insecure, needy and trust me, I know sin intimately. Judge someone for loving someone? No. Judge you? No, I'm interested in your pov and I am always willing to change mine.