Search found 809 matches

by Mallz
Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:59 pm
Forum: Christian Theology
Topic: Separation or Annihilation?
Replies: 98
Views: 30468

Re: Separation or Annihilation?

If God is correct in saying that "the wages of sin is death" and if we say that they never die, they can never get the wages and God is wrong? Romans 6:23. They do get their wages, appropriate to their works. Their torment will be as severe as their sin. I think about it like this: when y...
by Mallz
Sat Aug 02, 2014 1:44 am
Forum: Christian Theology
Topic: Separation or Annihilation?
Replies: 98
Views: 30468

Re: Separation or Annihilation?

So the wicked go on with their enjoyable sinful lives? Because they are getting what they want? What B.W. was saying is that they want to exist without God and His ways, and so God lets them exist without Him. They can't be tortured then, because that's not what they want ? If they are tortured, th...
by Mallz
Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:54 am
Forum: General Discussion & Introductions
Topic: Thank you for your comments.
Replies: 49
Views: 9685

Re: Thank you for your comments.

I see no reason to re-post what I have posted in the thread Domenic has started. But my response is there:
http://discussions.godandscience.org/vi ... =9&t=39570
by Mallz
Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:52 am
Forum: The Bible and Scripture
Topic: MALLZ.
Replies: 21
Views: 5105

Re: MALLZ.

He doesn't read nor listen to what Jesus says and doesn't read or respect what the Father says. He chooses to believe what man says and what his pride desires. His blatant disrespect for the Father, Jesus and man is disgusting. For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the gove...
by Mallz
Mon Jul 14, 2014 5:06 pm
Forum: General Discussion & Introductions
Topic: Thank you for your comments.
Replies: 49
Views: 9685

Re: Thank you for your comments.

He doesn't read anything we say in ANY thread. He doesn't read nor listen to what Jesus says and doesn't read or respect what the Father says. He chooses to believe what man says and what his pride desires. His blatant disrespect for the Father, Jesus and man is disgusting. Honestly, he might have b...
by Mallz
Sat Jul 12, 2014 5:44 pm
Forum: Aberrant Christianity
Topic: Jehovah witnesses
Replies: 308
Views: 109053

Re: Jehovah witnesses

Here is a medical fact. When a man dies it takes two to three days for his sperm(seed) to die...that is why he had to be dead that long Wrong, it takes hours for sperm to die in a corpse. Only if the testes are put in below freezing conditions, and the subject had a natural or un-traumatic death, w...
by Mallz
Fri Jul 11, 2014 4:45 pm
Forum: Prayer Requests
Topic: Request for my great Aunt
Replies: 10
Views: 3766

Re: Request for my great Aunt

Thanks Lonewolf :)
Next time I see her I'll tell her about your Dad Bippy, and they can chill until we arrive ^_^
by Mallz
Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:10 pm
Forum: Prayer Requests
Topic: Request for my great Aunt
Replies: 10
Views: 3766

Re: Request for my great Aunt

I'm back online :) Thank you Neo, Lover ;) and bippy. I've had many talks with her, and it's inspiring to see her readiness to leave this mortal coil. It was actually fun talking with another who doesn't fear death. And exciting discussing about what awaits us! And thank you for the suggestion Bippy...
by Mallz
Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:31 am
Forum: Prayer Requests
Topic: Request for my great Aunt
Replies: 10
Views: 3766

Request for my great Aunt

Hey everyone. My great Aunt Marie was diagnosed with an aggressive form of pancreatic cancer last night. I was with her from after the biopsy until she slept, and will go back to be with her until my Uncle arrives. She is old, has lived a good life and her soul is prepared. Her only fear is the pain...
by Mallz
Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:40 pm
Forum: Questions for Christians
Topic: Atheist response to big bang.
Replies: 88
Views: 17280

Re: Atheist response to big bang.

I'm confused on how you have drawn the conclusion that '..potential as “staying still” and actual as “motion”..' from our context in the conversation of movement vs non movement. I disagree with your conclusion, yes. But the clarity of the subject matter might be a failing on my part. Could you expl...
by Mallz
Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:18 pm
Forum: Aberrant Christianity
Topic: False doctrine of Eternal Torture in Hell
Replies: 55
Views: 39277

Re: False doctrine of Eternal Torture in Hell

Just wanted to say thanks for the post Paul, that was a great response to my question ^_^ I"m satisfied.
by Mallz
Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:16 pm
Forum: Questions for Christians
Topic: Atheist response to big bang.
Replies: 88
Views: 17280

Re: Atheist response to big bang.

You are starting to get it! Is English Aquinas first language? Nope, its Latin Because in English, motion is to not be still. Whenever you want to understand what someone is talking about, you have to use the terms the way they define them. And the meaning of words change throughout time. You unders...
by Mallz
Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:32 pm
Forum: Questions for Christians
Topic: Atheist response to big bang.
Replies: 88
Views: 17280

Re: Atheist response to big bang.

Where did he say God is the Unmoved mover? "Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover , put in motion by no other ;" He states it at the end. And explains it throughout the paragraph. Motion, defined by Aquinas is "nothing else than the reduction of something from potentia...
by Mallz
Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:54 am
Forum: Questions for Christians
Topic: Atheist response to big bang.
Replies: 88
Views: 17280

Re: Atheist response to big bang.

In that summary, he does not make the claim that God is in motion. He is actually stating God is not in motion, the unmoving mover. God can put things into motion. In other words, the pure actuality can actualize potentialities. You are still not using the the term 'motion' as Aquinas defines. It is...
by Mallz
Sun Jun 22, 2014 4:15 pm
Forum: Questions for Christians
Topic: Atheist response to big bang.
Replies: 88
Views: 17280

Re: Atheist response to big bang.

I'm in a work stretch right now (12 hour night shifts) so I haven't been as active on this thread as I'd like. But let me post now to re-direct where our conversation needs to go. I'm talking about the 3rd claim of his "argument from motion"; not his 8th claim. Ahh, I see the problem now. ...