Evidence for God from Science

Sure it does... It is the consensus of the scientific community that Matter and energy came into existence with the Big Bang. If you don't like the consensus position of the scientific community, that's fine. But... one more time... your real disagreement is with the consensus position of the scien...

Sure it does... It is the consensus of the scientific community that Matter and energy came into existence with the Big Bang. If you don't like the consensus position of the scientific community, that's fine. But... one more time... your real disagreement is with the consensus position of the scien...

According to Wikipedia, science is unable to describe the behavior of the universe during either the Planck Epoch or the singularity that initiated the Big Bang. Which means the first law of thermodynamics cannot be relied on to accurately describe the behavior of the earliest stages of the formati...

Yes... The consensus model described by National Geographic in this video explicitly states that matter, space, time, and energy were created by the Big Bang. Origins of the Universe 101 | National Geographic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdPzOWlLrbE I agree National Geographic does make the clai...

Yes... The consensus model described by National Geographic in this video explicitly states that matter, space, time, and energy were created by the Big Bang. Origins of the Universe 101 | National Geographic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdPzOWlLrbE I agree National Geographic does make the clai...

Again most scientists do acknowledge that matter, energy, space, and time were created by the Big Bang, as both National Geographic (hardly a bastion of religious fervor) videos explicitly state. To address your point, the physical laws of our universe, including the laws of physics, were also crea...

You are simply wrong on this one... And a lot of your misconceptions surround this particular issue. So I think it would be beneficial to clarify this specific point. Let me post links to two videos from National Geographic that confirm what science says about the Big Bang theory. There are many ma...

under Inflation and baryogenesis and then the remainder of the timeline section refers to offsets from 0 for a number of events. Under “Inflation and baryogenesis” 0 is the point when the singularity begins to expand, not when energy and matter was originated. To suggest energy and matter was creat...

That is also a factually accurate statement But none of those factually accurate statements do anything to rebut the fact that... the Big Bang theory DOES describe WHEN energy, time, and space were caused. In fact there is a timeline section beginning at time = 0 in the Big Bang article you referen...

Under Misconceptions, it says "the Big Bang model does not describe how energy, time, and space were caused" which is an accurate statement However, the Big Bang theory does describe WHEN energy, time, and space were caused. Here is what it says: One of the common misconceptions about the...

Sure it does... At or after time = 0. For example.. from your wikipedia article "Inflation stopped at around the 10−33 to 10−32 seconds mark, with the universe's volume having increased by a factor of at least 1078. Reheating occurred until the universe obtained the temperatures required for t...

As you point out scientists do not know HOW the universe began, but the Bing Bang theory does indicate WHEN the universe began. So, do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the Big Bang theory? The Big Bang theory describes WHEN the matter and energy in our universe began The Bi...

I don't follow you... The Universe we exist in is the "Universe we know". You correctly state that the "Universe we know" began to exist around 14 billion years ago. So whatever caused the Universe that we live in to "begin to exist" operates outside the confines of th...

That response is probably a retort of the claim that everything requires a source. If a source is not required of God, it isn’t much of a leap for someone to assume it isn’t required for the Universe. Some thoughts... A source is required for the universe because science tells us that our space/tim...

That response is probably a retort of the claim that everything requires a source. If a source is not required of God, it isn’t much of a leap for someone to assume it isn’t required for the Universe. Some thoughts... A source is required for the universe because science tells us that our space/tim...