Search found 3502 matches
- Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:10 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
- Replies: 1180
- Views: 245615
Re: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
This means with no evidence life can evolve we can take all of the evidence discovered in the earth and use it for evidence that there was a former world that existed and all of these fossils found just show us the kinds of life that lived in the former world and they have nothing to do with life e...
- Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:49 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
- Replies: 1180
- Views: 245615
Re: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
DNA is irrelevant... You have no idea what you're talking about...explains a lot of why you have such misinformed beliefs. Of course he doesn't. For that, we have, yes, evidence. You've been trying to pin him down-I guess-on his entire schpiel about how there- is -no -evidence, with, yes-there-is. ...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:24 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
- Replies: 1180
- Views: 245615
Re: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
I'm sorry that's not an objection. I could say what good is maths if only mathematicians can understand it? You can't blame your own ignorance or lack of research to say something isn't right. It isn't a trick to put you down, its a fact. I used to attack ToE, based on wrong info preached by my chu...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:20 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Transitional / intermediate
- Replies: 278
- Views: 59494
Re: Transitional / intermediate
So - Audie -- what about your thoughts regarding the birth of Jesus. Top of pg 11, to be found with a modicum of effort on your part, you say " mock evrrything that you've come across within it" (the bible) followed by other invidious statements about "errors in most everything."...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:06 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Transitional / intermediate
- Replies: 278
- Views: 59494
Re: Transitional / intermediate
Just like a married couple... y:-" I already have two wives. I don't need another. Besides, I have to be smarter than my wives. Therefore, Audie doesn't qualify. A pity. I'd have enjoyed screeching "Hey baldy, where is my sammich!!!" Yes, I was more thinking you'd be the one wearing ...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:36 am
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: "What time is"
- Replies: 98
- Views: 32092
Re: "What time is"
Jac3510 wrote:I don't think anyone is saying that, Audie.
If proof of god via first cause etc is offered in any part on the basis of a profound misunderstanding ofvwhat time is, then-?
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:03 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
- Replies: 1180
- Views: 245615
Re: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
Sorry ACB, you don't understand it and you show no evidence, just a few odd statements but your argument and your so called refutations are ignorant of TOE. Nothing more than a denial; and I kind of feel bad that you have convinced yourself of it. BTW I am not saying creationists can't understand e...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:39 am
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: "What time is"
- Replies: 98
- Views: 32092
Re: "What time is"
I don't really know what your perception of philosophy is, but it seems direly wrong to me. Science really couldn't get off the ground without it. And philosophy without science is like navigating blind. The two really mutually inform each other. Seemed others are saying that their metaphysics is a...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:58 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
- Replies: 1180
- Views: 245615
Re: RTB: Serious Problems with Evolution
ACB evolution has evidence after evidence its just you like many other anti-evolutionists don't understand and acknowledge it. No evidence life evolves though.If you know about evolution then nothing I have explained throughout this thread is wrong concerning evolution. You just choose to believe l...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:30 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Alleged “Consensus on Climate Change” Is Actually Only 75 Hand-Picked US Scientists
- Replies: 41
- Views: 12184
Re: Alleged “Consensus on Climate Change” Is Actually Only 75 Hand-Picked US Scientists
Mal Gore, is that you? Algore used periods, so prolly not. I was going to make a joke about how Mel's posts seem to indicate that she only posts when she has her period, but that ma2y be inappropriate. So never mind. Ew Rick! Hiding in Mel's closet is one thing, but when she has he period you could...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:16 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Transitional / intermediate
- Replies: 278
- Views: 59494
Re: Transitional / intermediate
RickD wrote:I already have two wives. I don't need another. Besides, I have to be smarter than my wives. Therefore, Audie doesn't qualify.Kurieuo wrote:Just like a married couple...
A pity. I'd have enjoyed screeching "Hey baldy, where is my sammich!!!"
- Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:35 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: "What time is"
- Replies: 98
- Views: 32092
Re: "What time is"
Ah, the headaches of understanding where science ends and philosophy starts... Or getting a philosopher to say they dont have a clue. Here are some thoughts for those sure of what time is as opposed to knowing some characteristics. https://www.wired.com/2010/02/what-is-time/ Regarding Sean Carroll ...
- Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:26 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Alleged “Consensus on Climate Change” Is Actually Only 75 Hand-Picked US Scientists
- Replies: 41
- Views: 12184
Re: Alleged “Consensus on Climate Change” Is Actually Only 75 Hand-Picked US Scientists
What is the go with Americans and the denial of global warming and the devasting effects that humans are having on our environment, from mass extinctions, to habitat destruction, greenhouse gases , gross over popularisation, destruction of the coral reefs, depletion of natural resources, deforestat...
- Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:21 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Transitional / intermediate
- Replies: 278
- Views: 59494
Re: Transitional / intermediate
I was asking before -- what is Your definition of 'mocking' / and I changed to the word 'derogatory' comments. So -- what is your definition Of. Because you come across as being offended by such an accusation. I was using the phrase 'most everything' as a generalization. I think it's an accurate as...
- Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:16 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Transitional / intermediate
- Replies: 278
- Views: 59494
Re: Transitional / intermediate
What is Your definition of 'mock/ing'? Derogatory comments , then. Yes, you Do make fun of what YOU consider to be stupid ideas. And, No, that is Not "completely unfair and unreasonable." You refer to it as intellectual honesty or dishonesty. I call 'it' rationalizing Your reaction to acb...