Evidence for God from Science

First to get souls, that is unarguable.

The sole two ancestors of all humankind is unsupportable.

What role do you see for them?

Starhunter, Please stop saying that believers who hold to evolution, dishonor God. If you want to argue for YEC that's fine. But do it without attacking believers who disagree with you. Besides, your argument fails. If creation was immediate just as salvation and God's healing is immediate, then yo...

Faith in any god may be for very insensible reasons. Maybe. One must do their homework. Maybe? Which god is it sensible to believe in,and why? From reason alone we can prove the existance of a timeless, immaterial, omniscient, omnipotent first mover. With a little revelation and faith the leap to t...

Starhunter, Please stop saying that believers who hold to evolution, dishonor God. If you want to argue for YEC that's fine. But do it without attacking believers who disagree with you. Besides, your argument fails. If creation was immediate just as salvation and God's healing is immediate, then yo...

http://themadmanchronicles.com/2014/02/08/black-man-proves-adam-and-eve-biblical-story-is-a-lie-his-dna-dates-back-338-thousand-years/ Is what this article says true? I'm worried about whether or not the story of Adam and Eve is true or not. If you want some sort of science, look to reputable sourc...

Byblos wrote:

Audie wrote:Faith in any god may be for very insensible reasons.

Maybe. One must do their homework.

Maybe? Which god is it sensible to believe in,and why?

All the rest of the gods and reasons would be insensible?

Starhunter, Please stop saying that believers who hold to evolution, dishonor God. If you want to argue for YEC that's fine. But do it without attacking believers who disagree with you. Besides, your argument fails. If creation was immediate just as salvation and God's healing is immediate, then yo...

Faith in any god may be for very insensible reasons.

Prove to me that it is possible to determine what is inside a brick.

Ok, thanks, good answer, I dont know of anything else to ask.

PaulSacramento wrote:Faith is synonymous with trust so if you prefer to use the term trust, it works just as well.
People tend to think "blind faith" when they think faith, that is the problem.

Some faith is blind, of course. How is trust in God not blind faith?

Hey all, it seems that a lot of people have a misunderstanding of the fundamentals of science. I lay blame for this entirely on the education system. I know I was shocked at the inaccuracy of my "science education" when I got out of high school. First of all, I would like to present some ...

Of course science does not do certainties, but yec looks awful unlikely.
Embedded age doesnt really improve the odds, i dont think.

Since faith is NOT about taking something based on LACK of evidence then it means that any proof about the existence of God does not/should not impact faith in a negative way. Does that answer your question then? How does that go with this? Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the eviden...

1over137 wrote:Audie,

You may continue discussing faith. I splitted the topic.

So i see, thanks!