Evidence for God from Science

Topic 3: The Truth Surrounding the Big Bang Prior to the instant of the Big Bang, our tools for understanding this event are scientifically useless. Since all math and physics principles break down at the level of the Planck Unit(Planck energy, Planck time, Planck length, Planck mass, and Planck te...

So, in a nutshell, you're saying life came from non-life, from chaos? There is an unimaginable number of events that led to enough time for order to come out of chaos. This was more than enough for life to begin. The first life was probably started by the first replicating molecule. This would have...

Topic 3: The Truth Surrounding the Big Bang Prior to the instant of the Big Bang, our tools for understanding this event are scientifically useless. Since all math and physics principles break down at the level of the Planck Unit(Planck energy, Planck time, Planck length, Planck mass, and Planck te...

So, in a nutshell, you're saying life came from non-life, from chaos? There is an unimaginable number of events that led to enough time for order to come out of chaos. This was more than enough for life to begin. The first life was probably started by the first replicating molecule. This would have...

Topic 3: The Truth Surrounding the Big Bang Prior to the instant of the Big Bang, our tools for understanding this event are scientifically useless. Since all math and physics principles break down at the level of the Planck Unit(Planck energy, Planck time, Planck length, Planck mass, and Planck tem...

Could you explain what you mean here? I thought evolution(biological) was what some people use to describe how life, WHICH ALREADY EXISTED, changes over time. You said it would be impossible for life not to evolve here, since 99.9% of the universe is unsuitable for life. If you're right about the 9...

Trulyenlightened wrote: Are you suggesting that only a person that is smarter than Einstein and the other prominent scientist, would not recognize, "..the necessity of a God to explain what exists, their many amazing designs and functionality, who also recognize the hard limits of what non-int...

Before we go down the road of science having proved / being able to prove the why's of spirituality and free will and consciousness and all that, let's remember one things that the likes of Harris and Dennet seem to keep forgetting: Observable Testable Repeatable Falsifiable For the nth time, Scien...

I will also do a topic on consciousness and the evolution of consciousness soon. Suffice to say, that we DO know where the centers of consciousness and intelligence are (medulla, cerebellum, cerebrum and the thalamus) in the brain. Suffice nothing. ;) Please cite studies. We DO know how and why it ...

Don, I'm afriad science has debunked that the size of brain has a direct correlation to intelligence. Indeed, a correlation between some physical "brain" element and consciousness isn't known. Throw in the fact our brains have been mapped, then it seems there is in fact no correlation bet...

TrulyE: Can you imagine the number of possible outcomes from billions upon billions upon billions of events, over billions of years? Wow! Think of it this way. If one person bets on lotto, his chances(odds) of winning are in the millions against. If the Universe had only one sun, one planet, and on...

This has already been explained. Don You're right, it has. Did you know that there are particles in you that are also theoretically on the moon and part of someone else at the same time? Did you also know that 73% of the Universe is composed of Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter, 3.5% Hydrogen and Helium...

Topic 0: I don't mean to be dismissive but I really have no clue where you're going with topics 1 thru whatever, except extreme skepticism, that is. So unless you want to admit extreme skepticism right now and save us all a boat load of time and effort, I suggest we follow a different track, one in...

Trulyenlightened wrote: Are you suggesting that only a person that is smarter than Einstein and the other prominent scientist, would not recognize, "..the necessity of a God to explain what exists, their many amazing designs and functionality, who also recognize the hard limits of what non-int...

Your attempts at diversion are truly pathetic as you have not addressed a single point I raised. But let’s see what happens without any of the polemics. So is it Aristotle's logic that all objects falling to earth, merely YEARN to be a part of the Earth correct? Or, is it that objects slow down onc...