Evidence for God from Science

You aren't going over my head, ACB. But if it makes you feel better to think so, then fine. You'll get no argument from me. Don't be so sensitive. It wasn't meant as a slight or whatever. This is about the evidence used in evolution science and what is confirmed and what is not confirmed. I'm not b...

The evidence for evolution is vast and only deniable by those that simply choose to not believe it. Rubbish, the evidence for evolution is not "vast", in fact the evidence that is available is quite small; a very many people smarter than you, I or anyone on this board deny evolution. Coul...

The evidence for evolution is vast and only deniable by those that simply choose to not believe it. I guess ab really does think he has studied evolution, knows a lot about it, and is capable of "talking over" someone's head. It is obviously not so, to anyone who actually has an interest,...

The thing that I consistantly notice about Audie is how she can believe life evolves without one scientist ever demonstrating it,she never saw it happpen,cannot see it happen,yet cannot believe things in the bible she didn't see. She will ignore that not being able to breed amongst a population som...

BTW, Audie, I rethought the strong arguments claim. All the ones I suggested are extremely powerful, in my view, but I think the Kalam argument would be a lot more interesting to you. You hold very strongly (intentionally or not) to a philosophical doctrine called epistemic responsibility, and I th...

I'm curious who Audie has in mind, as while Wise has made the claim she's talking about, I've not seen it repeated here. Even as frustratingly intractable as ACB is with his gappery nonsense, he at least pays lip service to the notion he could be wrong. I really don't know anybody here who has clai...

The thing that I consistantly notice about Audie is how she can believe life evolves without one scientist ever demonstrating it,she never saw it happpen,cannot see it happen,yet cannot believe things in the bible she didn't see. She will ignore that not being able to breed amongst a population som...

I'm going to get in here because Audie and I are talking about basically the same thing in PMing. Observing nature we see what animals Do mate and produce off-spring. And man Does have dominion over the animals world just as Genesis says. And there Is obviously a difference between man and the anim...

I'm curious who Audie has in mind, as while Wise has made the claim she's talking about, I've not seen it repeated here. Even as frustratingly intractable as ACB is with his gappery nonsense, he at least pays lip service to the notion he could be wrong. I really don't know anybody here who has clai...

I'm curious who Audie has in mind, as while Wise has made the claim she's talking about, I've not seen it repeated here. Even as frustratingly intractable as ACB is with his gappery nonsense, he at least pays lip service to the notion he could be wrong. I really don't know anybody here who has clai...

I'm curious who Audie has in mind, as while Wise has made the claim she's talking about, I've not seen it repeated here. Even as frustratingly intractable as ACB is with his gappery nonsense, he at least pays lip service to the notion he could be wrong. I really don't know anybody here who has clai...

I still don't agree but if you believe that to be the case then why do you bother with such Audie? If I were to argue for or against a position, any position at all, I would want to be presented with the strongest case possible so I don't waste my time attacking a weaker case. Only by attacking the...

The thing that I consistantly notice about Audie is how she can believe life evolves without one scientist ever demonstrating it,she never saw it happpen,cannot see it happen,yet cannot believe things in the bible she didn't see. She will ignore that not being able to breed amongst a population som...

I still don't agree but if you believe that to be the case then why do you bother with such Audie? If I were to argue for or against a position, any position at all, I would want to be presented with the strongest case possible so I don't waste my time attacking a weaker case. Only by attacking the...

Now, I was careful to say "those who" ( believe their reading is guided by god). A circumscribed group So you misread me thinking I assume all, or sweepingly generalize. Not at all. Understood, thank you for clarifying. Narrow focus is on those who do make an implicit claim to inerrant ac...